首页> 外文期刊>The Air Force Law Review >WHEN RELIANCE IS DETRIMENTAL: ECONOMIC, MORAL, AND POLICY ARGUMENTS FOR EXPECTATION DAMAGES IN CONTRACTS TERMINATED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT
【24h】

WHEN RELIANCE IS DETRIMENTAL: ECONOMIC, MORAL, AND POLICY ARGUMENTS FOR EXPECTATION DAMAGES IN CONTRACTS TERMINATED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT

机译:在有害的情况下:为方便起见而终止的合同中的预期损害的经济,道德和政策论证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a liberal democracy, government exists for the benefit of its people, not itself. The current T4C regime turns this on its head. The government of the United States pays more for the goods and services it needs, and it reserves to itself the right to violate its pledge in a technically legal, but morally suspect, way. The only benefit obtained in return is the assurance that the government will never pay, in any individual contract, for goods or services it ultimately does not need or receive. As the ultimate measure of value in these transactions is benefit to the people as a whole, I submit the cost is not worth the benefit.
机译:在自由民主制中,政府的存在是为了人民的利益,而不是自身的利益。当前的T4C体制扭转了这一局面。美国政府为所需的商品和服务支付更高的价格,并保留以技术上合法但在道德上令人怀疑的方式违反其承诺的权利。作为回报,唯一获得的好处是保证政府永远不会以任何单独的合同支付最终不需要或不会收到的商品或服务。由于这些交易中最终价值的衡量标准是整个人的利益,所以我认为付出的成本是不值得的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号