首页> 外文期刊>Agile project management advisory service executive updates >Software Project Failures: Part Ⅱ - Ignoring the Warning Signs
【24h】

Software Project Failures: Part Ⅱ - Ignoring the Warning Signs

机译:软件项目失败:第二部分-忽略警告标志

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What do we do when evidence conflicts with our beliefs? For example, if we believe that a project will be successful, how do we respond if the project begins to fail? 1 was recently made aware1 of the work of behavioral psychologist Leon Festinger at Stanford during the 1950s. Festinger explained that we tend to ignore the evidence that conflicts with our beliefs (especially if we hold them strongly) until it becomes overwhelming. Only then will we change our beliefs. Festinger's theory (he called it the "theory of cognitive dissonance" [4]) explains one of the most confounding findings of a recent Cutter Consortium survey on software project failures. It appears that the stage of software development in which an organization most commonly realizes that a project is failing is the end of the development schedule. Why would an organization wait that long? Surely, the signs of failure must have been quite clear much earlier.
机译:当证据与我们的信念发生冲突时,我们该怎么办?例如,如果我们认为一个项目将会成功,那么如果该项目开始失败,我们将如何应对?最近有1人意识到行为心理学家Leon Festinger在1950年代在斯坦福大学的工作。费斯廷格解释说,我们倾向于忽略与我们的信念相冲突的证据(尤其是如果我们坚守信念),直到它变得压倒一切。只有这样我们才能改变我们的信念。 Festinger的理论(他称其为“认知失调理论” [4])解释了最近Cutter联盟对软件项目失败所做的调查中最令人困惑的发现之一。看来,组织最通常意识到项目失败的软件开发阶段是开发进度表的结尾。一个组织为什么要等待那么长时间?当然,失败的迹象一定早就已经很清楚了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号