首页> 外文期刊>Advances in developing human resources >Conflicts Over the Utilities of Teaching Using Educational Technologies: An Interpretive Critical Inquiry
【24h】

Conflicts Over the Utilities of Teaching Using Educational Technologies: An Interpretive Critical Inquiry

机译:教育技术的教学实用性冲突:解释性批判性探究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public research universities are experiencing a major transformation today as they become more entrepreneurial and engage in academic capitalism (Bok, 2003; Slaughter & Rhoades, 2004). At the same time, faculty members in higher educational institutions are pushed to integrate educational technology into their teaching (Bennett & Bennett, 2003). These two requirements appear to be conflicting demands and affect, among others, faculty performance and job motivation. An interpretive critical inquiry was conducted to understand the faculty experience of attending to the two apparently conflicting demands. Based on the findings,offered are suggestions and recommendations for organizational change that will serve to alleviate the conflicts faculty may experience as well as implications for HRD in public research universities in terms of addressing academic capitalism and teaching using educational technology. The stakeholders at whom this inquiry is aimed include faculty, administrators, students, HRD scholars and practitioners, as well as the system of the public research university.
机译:随着公立研究型大学变得更具企业家精神并从事学术资本主义,它们正在经历着重大变革(Bok,2003; Slaughter&Rhoades,2004)。同时,高等教育机构的教职员工被要求将教育技术融入他们的教学中(Bennett&Bennett,2003)。这两个要求似乎是相互矛盾的要求,并且尤其会影响教师的绩效和工作动机。进行了一次解释性批判性探究,以了解教师们对满足这两个明显矛盾的要求的经验。根据调查结果,提出了有关组织变革的建议和建议,这些建议和建议将有助于减轻教师可能遇到的冲突,以及在解决学术资本主义和使用教育技术教学方面对公立研究型大学的人力资源开发产生的影响。此次调查的目标利益相关者包括教师,行政人员,学生,HRD学者和从业人员,以及公立研究型大学的体系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号