首页> 外文期刊>Advances in developing human resources >Coaching Scales: A Review of the Literature and Comparative Analysis
【24h】

Coaching Scales: A Review of the Literature and Comparative Analysis

机译:教练量表:文献综述与比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Problem. Given the relevance of scales for selecting managers, Peterson and Little called for an examination of scales used to measure coaching. However, there are few options from which to select validated scales used to measure coaching. Consequently, there appears to be a knowledge gap-little is known about the coaching scales that are available and how they have been validated and tested. The Solution. A proposed solution to the issue is to (a) present a comprehensive review of the literature, identifying coaching scales; (b) analyze those scales, providing information on scale item development, reliability, and validation of available scales; and (c) compare and clarify the efficacy of those scales. The Stakeholders. This literature review will benefit academic scholars, practitioners, and scholar-practitioners by supporting and encouraging their research. Identification and clarification of the existing scales, their focus, and validation processes can bridge the research/theory-practice gap.
机译:问题。考虑到选择经理人的量表的重要性,彼得森和利特尔呼吁检查用于衡量教练的量表。但是,很少有可供选择的选项来选择用于衡量教练的经过验证的量表。因此,关于可用的教练量表以及如何进行验证和测试的知识差距似乎很小。解决方案。建议的解决方案是(a)对文献进行全面回顾,确定指导水平; (b)分析那些秤,提供有关秤项目开发,可靠性和可用秤确认的信息; (c)比较并阐明这些量表的功效。利益相关者。通过支持和鼓励他们的研究,这篇文献综述将使学术学者,从业人员和学者从业人员受益。确定和澄清现有量表,其重点和验证过程可以弥合研究/理论-实践差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号