首页> 外文期刊>ACM transactions on computational logic >MTL and TPTL for One-Counter Machines: Expressiveness, Model Checking, and Satisfiability
【24h】

MTL and TPTL for One-Counter Machines: Expressiveness, Model Checking, and Satisfiability

机译:一柜式机器的MTL和TPTL:表达性,模型检查和可满足性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) and Timed Propositional Temporal Logic (TPTL) are quantitative extensions of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that are prominent and widely used in the verification of real-timed systems. We study MTL and TPTL as specification languages for one-counter machines. It is known that model checking one-counter machines against formulas of Freeze LTL (FLTL), a strict fragment of TPTL, is undecidable. We prove that in our setting, MTL is strictly less expressive than TPTL, and incomparable in expressiveness to FLTL, so undecidability for MTL is not implied by the result for FLTL. We show, however, that the model-checking problem for MTL is undecidable. We further prove that the satisfiability problem for the unary fragments of TPTL and MTL are undecidable; for TPTL, this even holds for the fragment in which only one register and the finally modality is used. This is opposed to a known decidability result for the satisfiability problem for the same fragment of FLTL.
机译:度量时态逻辑(MTL)和定时命题时态逻辑(TPTL)是线性时态逻辑(LTL)的定量扩展,在实时系统的验证中得到了广泛的应用。我们研究MTL和TPTL作为一台柜台计算机的规范语言。众所周知,根据TPTL的严格片段Freeze LTL(FLTL)的公式检查单计数器计算机的模型是不确定的。我们证明,在我们的环境中,MTL的表达严格低于TPTL,并且在FLTL的表达上无与伦比,因此FLTL的结果并不意味着MTL的不确定性。但是,我们显示MTL的模型检查问题尚不确定。我们进一步证明了TPTL和MTL一元片段的可满足性问题尚不确定。对于TPTL,这甚至适用于仅使用一个寄存器并使用最终形式的片段。这与针对相同FLTL片段的可满足性问题的已知可判定性结果相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号