首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Time-to-collision analysis of pedestrian and pedal-cycle accidents for the development of autonomous emergency braking systems
【24h】

Time-to-collision analysis of pedestrian and pedal-cycle accidents for the development of autonomous emergency braking systems

机译:行人和脚踏车事故的碰撞时间分析,以开发自动紧急制动系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to describe the position of pedestrians and pedal cyclists relative to the striking vehicle in the 3 s before Impact. This information is essential for the development of effective autonomous emergency braking systems and relevant test conditions for consumer ratings. The UK RAIDS-OTS study provided 175 pedestrian and 127 pedal-cycle cases based on in-depth, at-scene investigations of a representative sample of accidents in 2000-2010. Pedal cyclists were scattered laterally more widely than pedestrians (90% of cyclists within around +/- 80 degrees compared to +/- 20 degrees for pedestrians), however their distance from the striking vehicle in the seconds before impact was no greater (90% of cyclists within 42 m at 3 s compared to 50 m for pedestrians). This data is consistent with a greater involvement of slow moving vehicles in cycle accidents. The implication of the results is that AEB systems for cyclists require almost complete 180 degrees side-to-side vision but do not need a longer distance range than for pedestrians.
机译:这项研究的目的是描述撞击前3秒内行人和脚踏自行车相对于撞车的位置。该信息对于开发有效的自动紧急制动系统和相关的消费者额定测试条件至关重要。英国RAIDS-OTS研究基于对2000-2010年代表性事故样本的深入现场调查,提供了175个行人和127个脚踏车案例。脚踏车的骑行者比行人散布的横向距离更大(90%的骑车人在+/- 80度范围内,而行人在+/- 20度范围内),但是他们在撞击前几秒钟内与撞车的距离不大(90% 3秒内42 m以内的自行车手,而行人则为50 m)。该数据与慢速车辆在自行车事故中的更多参与是一致的。结果的暗示是,用于自行车骑行者的AEB系统需要几乎完整的180度左右视觉,但不需要比行人更长的距离范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号