...
首页> 外文期刊>Academy of Management Journal >PEER REVIEW IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: PREVALENCE AND EFFECTS OF REVIEWER HOSTILITY, BIAS, AND DISSENSUS
【24h】

PEER REVIEW IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: PREVALENCE AND EFFECTS OF REVIEWER HOSTILITY, BIAS, AND DISSENSUS

机译:组织和管理科学领域的同行评审:评审员的主持人,偏见和分歧的普遍性和影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Peer review is used in most scientific disciplines to assess the value of new knowledge presented in journal submissions. Individuals well versed in the appropriate research domain evaluate the quality of ideas, empirical rigor, and overall contribution conveyed by a manuscript. In essence, they serve a gate-keeping role by helping to filter out low-quality work (Crane, 1967; de Grazia, 1963). By so doing, they help to protect the integrity of the scientific enterprise and the status of established scholars, whose own claims to preeminence would be undermined by the publication of inferior work, particularly if that work were published in high-quality outlets (Cummings, Frost, & Vakil, 1985).
机译:同行评议在大多数科学学科中都用于评估期刊提交的新知识的价值。精通相应研究领域的个人会评估手稿传达的观念,经验的严谨性和总体贡献。从本质上讲,它们通过帮助过滤掉低质量的工作来起到守门人的作用(Crane,1967; de Grazia,1963)。这样一来,它们有助于保护科学事业的完整性和知名学者的地位,劣等作品的出版将削弱他们的卓越地位,特别是如果该作品是在高质量的出版物中出版的(卡明斯, Frost&Vakil,1985年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号