首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Typology of historical sources and the reconstruction of long-term historical changes of riverine fish: a case study of the Austrian Danube and northern Russian rivers
【2h】

Typology of historical sources and the reconstruction of long-term historical changes of riverine fish: a case study of the Austrian Danube and northern Russian rivers

机译:历史资源的类型学与河鱼类的长期历史变化的重建:以奥地利多瑙河和俄罗斯北部河流为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Historical data are widely used in river ecology to define reference conditions or to investigate the evolution of aquatic systems. Most studies rely on printed documents from the 19th century, thus missing pre-industrial states and human impacts. This article discusses historical sources that can be used to reconstruct the development of riverine fish communities from the Late Middle Ages until the mid-20th century. Based on the studies of the Austrian Danube and northern Russian rivers, we propose a classification scheme of printed and archival sources and describe their fish ecological contents. Five types of sources were identified using the origin of sources as the first criterion: (i) early scientific surveys, (ii) fishery sources, (iii) fish trading sources, (iv) fish consumption sources and (v) cultural representations of fish. Except for early scientific surveys, all these sources were produced within economic and administrative contexts. They did not aim to report about historical fish communities, but do contain information about commercial fish and their exploitation. All historical data need further analysis for a fish ecological interpretation. Three case studies from the investigated Austrian and Russian rivers demonstrate the use of different source types and underline the necessity for a combination of different sources and a methodology combining different disciplinary approaches. Using a large variety of historical sources to reconstruct the development of past fish ecological conditions can support future river management by going beyond the usual approach of static historical reference conditions.
机译:历史数据已广泛用于河流生态学中,以定义参考条件或调查水生系统的演变。大多数研究都依赖于19世纪的印刷文件,因此缺少工业化前的状态和对人类的影响。本文讨论了可用于重建中世纪晚期至20世纪中叶河沿鱼类群落发展的历史渊源。在对奥地利多瑙河和俄罗斯北部河流的研究基础上,我们提出了印刷和档案来源的分类方案,并描述了它们的鱼类生态成分。使用来源作为第一个标准,确定了五种来源:(i)早期科学调查;(ii)渔业来源;(iii)鱼类贸易来源;(iv)鱼类消费来源;(v)鱼的文化表征。除了早期的科学调查外,所有这些来源都是在经济和行政范围内产生的。他们的目的不是报告历史鱼类群落,而是包含有关商品鱼及其开发的信息。所有历史数据都需要进一步分析才能对鱼类进行生态学解释。来自被调查的奥地利和俄罗斯河流的三个案例研究证明了使用不同来源类型的情况,并强调了将不同来源相结合的必要性以及结合不同学科方法的方法的必要性。利用多种历史资源来重建过去鱼类生态条件的发展,可以超越通常的静态历史参考条件方法,从而支持未来的河流管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号