首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Scale in Claimants with Musculoskeletal Disorders
【2h】

Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy: Development and Validation of a Scale in Claimants with Musculoskeletal Disorders

机译:重返工作岗位的自我效能感:患有肌肉骨骼疾病的索赔人的量表的编制和验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction We report on the development and validation of a 10-item scale assessing self-efficacy within the return-to-work context, the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy (RTWSE) scale. Methods Lost-time claimants completed a telephone survey 1 month (n = 632) and 6 months (n = 446) after a work-related musculoskeletal injury. Exploratory (Varimax and Promax rotation) and confirmatory factor analyses of self-efficacy items were conducted with two separate subsamples at both time points. Construct validity was examined by comparing scale measurements and theoretically derived constructs, and the phase specificity of RTWSE was studied by examining changes in strength of relationships between the RTWSE Subscales and the other constructs at both time measures. Results Factor analyses supported three underlying factors: (1) Obtaining help from supervisor, (2) Coping with pain (3) Obtaining help from co-workers. Internal consistency (alpha) for the three subscales ranged from 0.66 to 0.93. The total variance explained was 68% at 1-month follow-up and 76% at 6-month follow-up. Confirmatory factor analyses had satisfactory fit indices to confirm the initial model. With regard to construct validity: relationships of RTWSE with depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, pain, and general health, were generally in the hypothesized direction. However, the hypothesis that less advanced stages of change on the Readiness for RTW scale would be associated with lower RTWSE could not be completely confirmed: on all RTWSE subscales, RTWSE decreased significantly for a subset of participants who started working again. Moreover, only Pain RTWSE was significantly associated with RTW status and duration of work disability. With regard to the phase specificity, the strength of association between RTWSE and other constructs was stronger at 6 months post-injury compared to 1 month post-injury. Conclusions A final 10-item version of the RTWSE has adequate internal consistency and validity to assess the confidence of injured workers to obtain help from supervisor and co-workers and to cope with pain. With regard to phase specificity, stronger associations between RTWSE and other constructs at 6-month follow-up suggest that the association between these psychological constructs consolidates over time after the disruptive event of the injury.
机译:引言我们报告了一个10项目量表的开发和验证,该量表用于评估工作回返背景下的自我效能,即工作回返自我效能(RTWSE)量表。方法在与工作有关的肌肉骨骼损伤后的1个月(n = 632)和6个月(n = 446)的情况下,失时索赔人完成了电话调查。在两个时间点使用两个单独的子样本进行自我效能项目的探索性研究(Varimax和Promax旋转)和确认性因素分析。通过比较量表测量和理论上得出的构建物来检验构建物的有效性,并通过检查两种时间量度下的RTWSE子量表与其他构建物之间的关系强度的变化来研究RTWSE的相特异性。结果因素分析支持三个基本因素:(1)向主管寻求帮助,(2)应对疼痛(3)向同事寻求帮助。三个分量表的内部一致性(alpha)在0.66至0.93之间。在1个月的随访中,解释的总方差为68%,在6个月的随访中为76%。验证性因素分析具有令人满意的拟合指数以确认初始模型。关于建构效度:RTWSE与抑郁症状,避免恐惧,疼痛和总体健康的关系通常处于假设的方向。但是,无法完全确认以下假设:RTW量表准备就绪的较低阶段的变更将与较低的RTWSE相关:在所有RTWSE量表上,一部分重新开始工作的参与者的RTWSE显着下降。此外,仅疼痛RTWSE与RTW状态和工作残障持续时间显着相关。关于阶段特异性,与受伤后1个月相比,受伤后6个月RTWSE与其他构建体之间的结合强度更强。结论RTWSE的最终版本10个项目具有足够的内部一致性和有效性,以评估受伤工人的信心,以寻求上司和同事的帮助并应对痛苦。关于阶段特异性,在6个月的随访中,RTWSE与其他构建体之间的关联更强,这表明这些心理构建体之间的关联在损伤破坏性事件后随着时间而巩固。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号