首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Marine ecosystem health status assessment through integrative biomarker indices: a comparative study after the Prestige oil spill Mussel Watch
【2h】

Marine ecosystem health status assessment through integrative biomarker indices: a comparative study after the Prestige oil spill Mussel Watch

机译:通过生物标志物综合指数评估海洋生态系统健康状况:溢油事故贻贝观察之后的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Five integrative biomarker indices are compared: Bioeffects Assessment Index (BAI), Health Status Index (HSI), integrated biological response (IBR), ecosystem health condition chart (EHCC) and Integrative Biomarker Index (IBI). They were calculated on the basis of selected biomarker data collected in the framework of the Prestige oil spill (POS) Mussel Watch monitoring (2003–2006) carried out in Galicia and the Bay of Biscay. According to the BAI, the health status of mussels was severely affected by POS and signals of recovery were evidenced in Galicia after April-04 and in Biscay Bay after April-05. The HSI (computed by an expert system) revealed high levels of environmental stress in 2003 and a recovery trend from April-04 to April-05. In July-05, the health status of mussels worsened but in October-05 and April-06 healthy condition was again recorded in almost all localities. IBR and IBI indicated that mussel health was severely affected in 2003 and improved from 2004 onwards. EHCC reflected a deleterious environmental condition in 2003 and a recovery trend after April-04, although a healthy ecosystem condition was not achieved in April-06 yet. Whereas BAI and HSI provide a basic indication of the ecosystem health status, star plots accompanying IBR and IBI provide complementary information concerning the mechanisms of biological response to environmental insult. Overall, although the integrative indices based on biomarkers show different sensitivity, resolution and informative output, all of them provide coherent information, useful to simplify the interpretation of biological effects of pollution in marine pollution monitoring. Each others’ advantages, disadvantages and applicability for ecosystem health assessment are discussed.
机译:比较了五个综合生物标志物指数:生物效应评估指数(BAI),健康状况指数(HSI),综合生物反应(IBR),生态系统健康状况图(EHCC)和综合生物标志物指数(IBI)。它们是根据在加里西亚和比斯开湾进行的Prestige溢油(POS)贻贝监视(2003-2006)监测框架内收集的选定生物标记数据计算得出的。根据BAI的说法,贻贝的健康状况受到POS的严重影响,在4月4日之后的加利西亚和在5月4日之后的比斯开湾有恢复迹象。恒指(由专家系统计算)在2003年显示出高水平的环境压力,并于4月4日至4月5日恢复趋势。在05年7月,贻贝的健康状况恶化了,但是在几乎所有地区,都再次记录了健康状况。 IBR / n和IBI指出,贻贝的健康状况在2003年受到严重影响,从2004年开始有所改善。 EHCC反映了2003年的有害环境状况和4月4日之后的恢复趋势,尽管在6月6日尚未达到健康的生态系统状况。 BAI和HSI提供了生态系统健康状况的基本指示,而IBR / n和IBI随附的星图提供了有关对环境侵害的生物反应机制的补充信息。总体而言,尽管基于生物标志物的综合指数显示出不同的敏感性,分辨率和信息输出,但它们全都提供了一致的信息,有助于简化对海洋污染监测中污染的生物效应的解释。讨论了彼此的优势,劣势和在生态系统健康评估中的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号