首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Cognitive and Field Testing of a New Set of Medication Adherence Self-Report Items for HIV Care
【2h】

Cognitive and Field Testing of a New Set of Medication Adherence Self-Report Items for HIV Care

机译:一套新的艾滋病治疗药物依从性自我报告项目的认知和现场测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We conducted four rounds of cognitive testing of self-report items that included 66 sociodemographically diverse participants, then field tested the three best items from the cognitive testing in a clinic waiting room (N = 351) and in an online social networking site for men who have sex with men (N = 6,485). As part of the online survey we conducted a randomized assessment of two versions of the adherence questionnaire—one which asked about adherence to a specific antiretroviral medication, and a second which asked about adherence to their “HIV medicines” as a group. Participants were better able to respond using adjectival and adverbial scales than visual analogue or percent items. The internal consistency reliability of the three item adherence scale was 0.89. Mean scores for the two different versions of the online survey were similar (91.0 vs. 90.2, p < 0.05), suggesting that it is not necessary, in general, to ask about individual medications in an antiretroviral therapy regimen when attempting to describe overall adherence.
机译:我们进行了四轮自我报告项目的认知测试,其中包括66名不同社会人口学的参与者,然后在诊所候诊室(N = 351)和在线社交网站中对认知测试中的三个最佳项目进行了实地测试,以供那些与男人发生性关系(N = 6,485)。作为在线调查的一部分,我们对两种版本的依从性问卷进行了随机评估-一个询问有关特定抗逆转录病毒药物的依从性,另一询问有关其“ HIV药物”作为一组的依从性。与视觉类似物或百分比项目相比,参与者使用形容词和副词量表的反应能力更好。三项遵守量表的内部一致性信度为0.89。两种不同版本的在线调查的平均得分相似(91.0 vs.90.2,p <0.05),这表明在尝试描述总体依从性时,一般而言无需询问抗逆转录病毒疗法中的个别药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号