首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Validity and reliability of the Cold Discomfort Scale: a subjective judgement scale for the assessment of patient thermal state in a cold environment
【2h】

Validity and reliability of the Cold Discomfort Scale: a subjective judgement scale for the assessment of patient thermal state in a cold environment

机译:感冒不适量表的有效性和可靠性:用于评估寒冷环境中患者热状态的主观判断量表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Complementary measures for the assessment of patient thermoregulatory state, such as subjective judgement scales, might be of considerable importance in field rescue scenarios where objective measures such as body core temperature, skin temperature, and oxygen consumption are difficult to obtain. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in healthy subjects, the reliability of the Cold Discomfort Scale (CDS), a subjective judgement scale for the assessment of patient thermal state in cold environments, defined as test–retest stability, and criterion validity, defined as the ability to detect a difference in cumulative cold stress over time. Twenty-two healthy subjects performed two consecutive trials (test–retest). Dressed in light clothing, the subjects remained in a climatic chamber set to −20 °C for 60 min. CDS ratings were obtained every 5 min. Reliability was analysed by test–retest stability using weighted kappa coefficient that was 0.84 including all the 5-min interval measurements. When analysed separately at each 5-min interval the weighted kappa coefficients were was 0.48–0.86. Criterion validity was analysed by comparing median CDS ratings of a moving time interval. The comparison revealed that CDS ratings were significantly increased for every interval of 10, 15, and 30 min (p < 0.001) but not for every interval of 5 min. In conclusion, in a prehospital scenario, subjective judgement scales might be a valuable measure for the assessment of patient thermal state. The results of this study indicated that, in concious patients, the CDS may be both reliable and valid for such purpose.
机译:评估患者体温调节状态的补充措施(例如主观判断量表)在难以获得客观措施(例如体温,皮肤温度和氧气消耗)的野外抢救场景中可能具有相当重要的意义。这项研究的目的是评估健康受试者的寒冷不适量表(CDS)的可靠性,这是一种用于评估寒冷环境中患者热状态的主观判断量表,定义为测试-再测试稳定性和标准有效性,定义为随着时间的推移检测累积冷应力差异的能力。 22名健康受试者进行了两次连续试验(重新测试)。穿着轻便的衣服,受试者在设置为-20°C的气候室内放置60分钟。每5分钟获得一次CDS评级。使用包括所有5分钟间隔测量值的加权kappa系数为0.84的重试稳定性来分析可靠性。在每5分钟间隔分别进行分析时,加权kappa系数为0.48–0.86。通过比较移动时间间隔的中位数CDS评分分析标准有效性。比较显示,CDS分级在每10、15和30分钟的间隔中显着增加(p <0.001),但在每5分钟的间隔中没有增加。总之,在院前情况下,主观判断量表可能是评估患者热状态的有价值的措施。这项研究的结果表明,对于有意识的患者,CDS为此目的可能既可靠又有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号