首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Madness Decolonized?: Madness as Transnational Identity in Gail Hornstein’s Agnes’s Jacket
【2h】

Madness Decolonized?: Madness as Transnational Identity in Gail Hornstein’s Agnes’s Jacket

机译:疯掉了吗?:盖尔·霍恩斯坦(Gail Hornstein)的艾格尼丝(Agnes)外套中的跨国身份疯狂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The US psychologist Gail Hornstein’s monograph, Agnes’s Jacket: A Psychologist’s Search for the Meanings of Madness (2009), is an important intervention in the identity politics of the mad movement. Hornstein offers a resignified vision of mad identity that embroiders the central trope of an “anti-colonial” struggle to reclaim the experiential world “colonized” by psychiatry. A series of literal and figurative appeals makes recourse to the inner world and (corresponding) cultural world of the mad as well as to the ethno-symbolic cultural materials of dormant nationhood. This rhetoric is augmented by a model in which the mad comprise a diaspora without an origin, coalescing into a single transnational community. The mad are also depicted as persons displaced from their metaphorical homeland, the “inner” world “colonized” by the psychiatric regime. There are a number of difficulties with Hornstein’s rhetoric, however. Her “ethnicity-and-rights” response to the oppression of the mad is symptomatic of Western parochialism, while her proposed transmutation of putative psychopathology from limit upon identity to parameter of successful identity is open to contestation. Moreover, unless one accepts Hornstein’s porous vision of mad identity, her self-ascribed insider status in relation to the mad community may present a problematic “re-colonization” of mad experience.
机译:美国心理学家盖尔·霍恩斯坦(Gail Hornstein)的专着《阿格尼丝的夹克:心理学家对疯狂的意义的追寻》(2009年)是对疯狂运动的身份政治的重要干预。霍恩斯坦提出了一种疯狂身份认同的标志性观点,这种观点使“反殖民”斗争的中心论调绣上了句号,以夺回被精神病学“殖民”的经验世界。一系列的文字和象征性诉求诉诸于疯狂的内心世界和(相应的)文化世界,以及休眠国家的民族象征文化材料。这种言辞通过一种模式得以增强,在这种模式下,疯子组成了一个没有血统的侨民,并合并成一个跨国社区。疯子还被描述为从隐喻家园流离失所的人,即被精神病政权“殖民化”的“内在”世界。但是,霍恩斯坦的言论有很多困难。她对疯子的压迫的“民族和权利”反应是西方狭ism主义的症状,而她提议的推论性精神病理学从限制身份到成功身份的参数的转变则容易引起争论。此外,除非有人接受霍恩斯坦对疯狂身份的渗透性视野,否则她对疯狂社区的自我归类的内部人身份可能会带来对疯狂经历的“重新殖民化”问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号