首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Intensification of constructed wetlands for land area reduction: a review
【2h】

Intensification of constructed wetlands for land area reduction: a review

机译:人工湿地集约化以减少土地面积:回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The large land area requirement of constructed wetlands (CWs) is a major limitation of its application especially in densely populated and mountainous areas. This review paper provides insights on different strategies applied for the reduction of land area including stack design and intensification of CWs with different aeration methods. The impacts of different aeration methods on the performance and land area reduction were extensively and critically evaluated for nine wetland systems under three aeration strategies such as tidal flow (TF), effluent recirculation (ER), and artificial aeration (AA) applied on three types of CWs including vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW), horizontal flow constructed wetland (HFCW), and hybrid constructed wetland (HCW). The area reduction and pollutant removal efficiency showed substantial variation among different types of CWs and aeration strategies. The ER-VFCW designated the smallest footprint of 1.1 ± 0.5 m2 PE−1 (population equivalent) followed by TF-VFCW with the footprint of 2.1 ± 1.8 m2 PE−1, and the large footprint was of AA-HFCW (7.8 ± 4.7 m2 PE−1). When footprint and removal efficiency both are the major indicators for the selection of wetland type, the best options for practical application could be TF-VFCW, ER-HCW, and AA-HCW. The data and results outlined in this review could be instructive for futures studies and practical applications of CWs for wastewater treatment, especially in land-limited regions.
机译:人工湿地(CW)的大面积需求是其应用的主要限制,尤其是在人口稠密和山区。这篇综述文章提供了有关减少土地面积的不同策略的见解,包括采用不同的曝气方法进行烟囱设计和强化化武的集约化设计。在三种潮气(TF),污水再循环(ER)和人工曝气(AA)这三种类型的三种曝气策略下,针对九种湿地系统,广泛而严格地评估了不同曝气方法对性能和土地面积减少的影响。 CW,包括垂直流动人工湿地(VFCW),水平流动人工湿地(HFCW)和混合人工湿地(HCW)。面积减少和污染物去除效率在不同类型的连续水和曝气策略之间显示出很大的差异。 ER-VFCW指定的最小占用空间为1.1±0.5 m 2 PE -1 (等效人口),其后是TF-VFCW,其占用空间为2.1±1.8 m 2 PE −1 ,且占地大的是AA-HFCW(7.8±4.7 m 2 PE -1 ) 。当足迹和清除效率都是选择湿地类型的主要指标时,实际应用的最佳选择可能是TF-VFCW,ER-HCW和AA-HCW。这篇综述中概述的数据和结果可能对未来研究和连续水处理废水的实际应用具有指导意义,特别是在土地有限的地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号