首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset
【2h】

A Comparison of Accelerated and Non-accelerated MRI Scans for Brain Volume and Boundary Shift Integral Measures of Volume Change: Evidence from the ADNI Dataset

机译:加速和非加速MRI扫描对大脑体积和体积变化的边界移位积分测量值的比较:来自ADNI数据集的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of accelerated MRI scans in place of non-accelerated scans influenced brain volume and atrophy rate measures in controls and subjects with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. We used data from 861 subjects at baseline, 573 subjects at 6 months and 384 subjects at 12 months from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We calculated whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal atrophy rates using the k-means boundary shift integral (BSI). Scan quality was visually assessed and the proportion of good quality accelerated and non-accelerated scans compared. We also compared MMSE scores, vascular burden and age between subjects with poor quality scans with those with good quality scans. Finally, we estimated sample size requirements for a hypothetical clinical trial when using atrophy rates from accelerated scans and non-accelerated scans. No significant differences in whole-brain, ventricular and hippocampal volumes and atrophy rates were found between accelerated and non-accelerated scans. Twice as many non-accelerated scan pairs suffered from at least some motion artefacts compared with accelerated scan pairs (p ≤ 0.001), which may influence the BSI. Subjects whose accelerated scans had significant motion had a higher mean vascular burden and age (p ≤ 0.05) whilst subjects whose non-accelerated scans had significant motion had poorer MMSE scores (p ≤ 0.05). No difference in estimated sample size requirements was found when using accelerated vs. non-accelerated scans. Accelerated scans reduce scan time and are better tolerated. Therefore it may be advantageous to use accelerated over non-accelerated scans in clinical trials that use ADNI-type protocols, especially in more cognitively impaired subjects.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12021-017-9326-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在患有轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默氏病的对照组和受试者中,使用加速MRI扫描代替非加速扫描是否会影响脑容量和萎缩率测量。我们使用了来自阿尔茨海默氏病神经影像学计划(ADNI)的基线时861名受试者,6个月时573名受试者和12个月时384名受试者的数据。我们使用k均值边界移位积分(BSI)计算了全脑,心室和海马萎缩率。目测评估扫描质量,并比较高质量的加速扫描和非加速扫描的比例。我们还比较了扫描质量差的受试者与扫描质量好的受试者之间的MMSE评分,血管负担和年龄。最后,当使用加速扫描和非加速扫描的萎缩率时,我们估计了一个假设的临床试验的样本量要求。在加速和非加速扫描之间,全脑,心室和海马体积以及萎缩率均无显着差异。与加速扫描对相比,遭受至少一些运动伪影的非加速扫描对的数量是加速扫描对的两倍(p≤0.001),这可能会影响BSI。加速扫描具有明显运动的受试者的平均血管负担和年龄较高(p≤0.05),而非加速扫描具有明显运动的受试者的MMSE评分较差(p≤0.05)。使用加速扫描和非加速扫描时,估计的样本量要求没有差异。加快扫描速度可减少扫描时间,并具有更好的耐受性。因此,在使用ADNI型方案的临床试验中使用加速扫描而非非加速扫描可能是有利的,尤其是在认知能力较弱的受试者中。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s12021-017-9326-0 )包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号