首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Assessment of Finite Rate Chemistry Large Eddy Simulation Combustion Models
【2h】

Assessment of Finite Rate Chemistry Large Eddy Simulation Combustion Models

机译:有限速率化学大涡模拟燃烧模型的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Large Eddy Simulations (LES) of a swirl-stabilized natural gas-air flame in a laboratory gas turbine combustor is performed using six different LES combustion models to provide a head-to-head comparative study. More specifically, six finite rate chemistry models, including the thickened flame model, the partially stirred reactor model, the approximate deconvolution model and the stochastic fields model have been studied. The LES predictions are compared against experimental data including velocity, temperature and major species concentrations measured using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), OH Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (OH-PLIF), OH chemiluminescence imaging and one-dimensional laser Raman scattering. Based on previous results a skeletal methane-air reaction mechanism based on the well-known Smooke and Giovangigli mechanism was used in this work. Two computational grids of about 7 and 56 million cells, respectively, are used to quantify the influence of grid resolution. The overall flow and flame structures appear similar for all LES combustion models studied and agree well with experimental still and video images. Takeno flame index and chemical explosives mode analysis suggest that the flame is premixed and resides within the thin reaction zone. The LES results show good agreement with the experimental data for the axial velocity, temperature and major species, but differences due to the choice of LES combustion model are observed and discussed. Furthermore, the intrinsic flame structure and the flame dynamics are similarly predicted by all LES combustion models examined. Within this range of models, there is no strong case for deciding which model performs the best.
机译:使用六个不同的LES燃烧模型对实验室燃气轮机燃烧器中的稳定涡旋的天然气-空气火焰进行大涡模拟(LES),以进行对比研究。更具体地说,研究了六个有限速率化学模型,包括加厚火焰模型,部分搅拌反应器模型,近似解卷积模型和随机场模型。将LES预测值与实验数据进行比较,这些实验数据包括使用粒子图像测速(PIV),OH平面激光诱导的荧光(OH-PLIF),OH化学发光成像和一维激光拉曼散射测量的速度,温度和主要物质浓度。基于先前的结果,在这项工作中使用了基于众所周知的Smooke和Giovangigli机理的骨架甲烷-空气反应机理。分别使用约7个和5600万个像元的两个计算网格来量化网格分辨率的影响。研究的所有LES燃烧模型的整体流动和火焰结构看起来都相似,并且与实验静止图像和视频图像非常吻合。 Takeno火焰指数和化学炸药模式分析表明,火焰已预混并存在于稀薄的反应区内。 LES的结果与轴向速度,温度和主要种类的实验数据显示出很好的一致性,但是观察到并讨论了由于LES燃烧模型的选择而引起的差异。此外,所检查的所有LES燃烧模型都类似地预测了固有火焰结构和火焰动力学。在此模型范围内,没有强有力的理由来决定哪个模型表现最佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号