首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Herbicides in vineyards reduce grapevine root mycorrhization and alter soil microorganisms and the nutrient composition in grapevine roots leaves xylem sap and grape juice
【2h】

Herbicides in vineyards reduce grapevine root mycorrhization and alter soil microorganisms and the nutrient composition in grapevine roots leaves xylem sap and grape juice

机译:葡萄园中的除草剂减少了葡萄根的菌根并改变了土壤微生物以及葡萄根叶木质部汁液和葡萄汁中的营养成分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Herbicides are increasingly applied in vineyards worldwide. However, not much is known on potential side effects on soil organisms or on the nutrition of grapevines (Vitis vinifera). In an experimental vineyard in Austria, we examined the impacts of three within-row herbicide treatments (active ingredients: flazasulfuron, glufosinate, glyphosate) and mechanical weeding on grapevine root mycorrhization; soil microorganisms; earthworms; and nutrient concentration in grapevine roots, leaves, xylem sap and grape juice. The three herbicides reduced grapevine root mycorrhization on average by 53% compared to mechanical weeding. Soil microorganisms (total colony-forming units, CFU) were significantly affected by herbicides with highest CFUs under glufosinate and lowest under glyphosate. Earthworms (surface casting activity, density, biomass, reproduction) or litter decomposition in soil were unaffected by herbicides. Herbicides altered nutrient composition in grapevine roots, leaves, grape juice and xylem sap that was collected 11 months after herbicide application. Xylem sap under herbicide treatments also contained on average 70% more bacteria than under mechanical weeding; however, due to high variability, this was not statistically significant. We conclude that interdisciplinary approaches should receive more attention when assessing ecological effects of herbicides in vineyard ecosystems.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-018-2422-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:除草剂在世界各地的葡萄园中越来越多地使用。但是,对于土壤生物或葡萄的营养(葡萄)的潜在副作用知之甚少。在奥地利的一个实验性葡萄园中,我们研究了三种行内除草剂处理(活性成分:黄酮磺隆,草铵膦,草甘膦)和机械除草对葡萄根菌根的影响。土壤微生物; ;;和葡萄根,叶,木质部汁液和葡萄汁中的养分含量。与机械除草相比,这三种除草剂平均使葡萄根的菌根减少了53%。除草剂对土壤微生物(总菌落形成单位,CFU)的影响最大,草铵膦下的CFU最高,草甘膦下的CFU最低。 ((表面施肥活性,密度,生物量,繁殖)或土壤中的凋落物分解不受除草剂的影响。除草剂改变了除草剂施用11个月后收集的葡萄根,叶子,葡萄汁和木质部汁液中的营养成分。除草剂处理后的木质部汁液平均比机械除草的细菌含量高70%。但是,由于变异性高,因此在统计上并不显着。我们得出的结论是,在评估葡萄园生态系统中的除草剂的生态效应时,应采取更多的跨学科方法。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s11356-018-2422-3)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号