首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
【2h】

Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium

机译:科学诚信原则和最佳做法:科学诚信联盟的建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.
机译:一个科学诚信联盟制定了一套推荐的原则和最佳实践,可以广泛地用于各个科学学科,作为达成关于科学完整性标准的共识的机制,并更好地使科学家有能力在快速变化的研究环境中开展工作。代表科学过程应在其中运行的总括的两个原则如下:(1)在科学过程中培养诚信文化。 (2)循证政策利益可能会在影响研究过程的各个方面发挥正当的作用,但这些作用不应干扰科学的完整性。在执行这两项总体原则时,应灌输九种最佳科学实践的最佳做法是:(1)要求以健壮的科学方法,使用适当的实验设计和统计数据以及对各级科学家进行负责任的研究实践进行普遍培训,包括培训内容由合格的科学家定期更新和介绍。 (2)加强整个研究过程中的科学诚信监督和程序,重点是道德和行为方面的培训。 (3)通过透明性鼓励研究的可重复性。 (4)努力将开放科学作为整个科学企业的标准操作程序。 (5)开发和实施教育工具,以教授维护科学诚信的沟通技巧。 (6)努力寻找进一步加强同行评审程序的方法。 (7)鼓励科学期刊发表符合质量和科学诚信标准的意外发现。 (8)在期刊之间寻求统一,快速,一致和透明的过程,以纠正和/或撤回已​​发表的论文。 (9)设计严格而全面的评估标准,以认可和奖励科学研究中的最高诚信标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号