首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Can digital X-ray radiogrammetry be an alternative for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of secondary low bone quality in children?
【2h】

Can digital X-ray radiogrammetry be an alternative for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of secondary low bone quality in children?

机译:数字X射线放射线照相术是否可以替代双能X线骨密度仪来诊断儿童继发性低骨质量?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bone quality in children is generally measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) uses BoneXpert to measure cortical bone quality on hand radiographs. This prospective study compared DXR and DXA results in children with high probability of secondary low bone quality, defined as DXA of the lumbar spine (DXALS) Z-score ≤ − 2.0. One hundred one children underwent both DXA and DXR assessment. DXALSZ-scores were also adjusted for bone age. DXR Z-scores were compared with both DXALSZ-scores, using Pearson correlations, Bland-Altman analysis, and sensitivity-specificity analysis. Mean bone age, DXR, and both DXA Z-scores were significantly impaired. Pearson correlation coefficients were significant between DXR Z-scores and both DXALSZ-scores 0.507–0.564 (p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.05–0.48 between DXR and both DXA Z-scores and showed more than 90% similarity for both DXALSZ-scores ≤ − 2.0. DXR had a sensitivity of 67–71% and specificity of 77–83% compared to both DXALSZ-scores.Conclusion: DXR correlates well with as well DXALS as bone age-adjusted DXALSZ-scores and shows good agreement with as well DXALS as bone age-adjusted DXALSZ-scores ≤ − 2.0. DXR shows best results when compared with DXALSZ-scores. frame="hsides" rules="groups" class="rendered small default_table">> colspan="2" rowspan="1"> >What is Known: • Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) may correlate well with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients. • DXR is a feasible method for assessment of bone quality in children. > colspan="2" rowspan="1"> >What is New: • This is the first prospective study in children with suspected secondary low bone quality that illustrates correlation between DXR and bone age-adjusted DXA Z-scores and that shows good agreement between DXR and DXA as bone age-adjusted DXA Z-scores ≤ −2.0. • Our results suggest DXR to be a good alternative for DXA for determining low bone quality.
机译:儿童的骨骼质量通常使用双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)进行测量。数字X射线放射线照相术(DXR)使用BoneXpert来测量手部X光片上的皮质骨质量。这项前瞻性研究比较了DXR和DXA在患有继发性骨质低下的儿童中的高结果,这些儿童被定义为腰椎DXA(DXALS)Z评分≤-2.0。 101名儿童接受了DXA和DXR评估。 DXALSZ得分也根据骨龄进行了调整。使用Pearson相关性,Bland-Altman分析和灵敏度特异性分析,将DXR Z得分与DXALSZ得分进行比较。平均骨龄,DXR和两个DXA Z评分均明显受损。 DXR Z评分与DXALSZ评分之间的Pearson相关系数均显着为0.507-0.564(p <0.001)。 Bland-Altman分析显示DXR与两个DXA Z评分之间的平均差异为0.05-0.48,对于两个≤-2.0的DXALSZ评分,均显示超过90%的相似性。与两个DXALSZ评分相比,DXR的敏感性为67-71%,特异性为77-83%。结论:DXR与DXALS以及骨龄校正后的DXALSZ评分相关性很好,并且与DXALS以及骨骼均显示出良好的一致性年龄调整后的DXALSZ得分≤2.0。与DXALSZ得分相比,DXR显示出最佳结果。<!-表ft1-> <!-表包装模式=“锚定” t5-> <表框架=“ hsides” rules =“ groups” class = “ rendered small default_table”> > colspan =“ 2” rowspan =“ 1”> >已知信息:•数字X射线放射线照相术(DXR)可能与双小儿,青少年和成年患者的X射线能量吸收法(DXA)。 •DXR是评估儿童骨骼质量的可行方法。 > colspan =“ 2” rowspan =“ 1”> >什么是新增: •这是第一项针对疑似继发性低骨质量儿童的前瞻性研究,该研究表明了DXR与骨龄调整后的DXA Z评分之间的相关性,并且表明DXR与DXA在骨龄方面具有良好的一致性调整后的DXA Z分数≤−2.0。 •我们的结果表明DXR是DXA判定低骨质的好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号