首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Prevention of cisplatin-based chemotherapy-induced delayed nausea and vomiting using triple antiemetic regimens: a mixed treatment comparison
【2h】

Prevention of cisplatin-based chemotherapy-induced delayed nausea and vomiting using triple antiemetic regimens: a mixed treatment comparison

机译:三种止吐方案预防基于顺铂的化疗引起的延迟性恶心和呕吐:混合治疗比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A variety of triple antiemetic regimens are being used to prevent cisplatin-based chemotherapy induced delayed emesis and nausea in cancer patients. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of the different regimens. Electronic searches of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases were performed to identify randomized controlled trials, and data were analyzed using JAGS, Stata 14.0 and R project. The primary outcome was a complete response (CR). The secondary outcomes were no vomiting (NV) and no nausea (NN). Among the 398 studies identified, 10 were eligible and included, providing data on nine regimens. In the CR analysis, the absolute rank of netupitant + palonosetron + dexamethasone (NEPA) was 0.8579. In the NV and NN analyses, NEPA's absolute ranks were 0.8631 and 0.7902, respectively. The compliance of patients treated with rolapitant + granisetron + dexamethasone (RGD) was the best due to a low incidence of adverse events, and good compliance was also observed with NEPA. It was difficult to achieve good compliance with aprepitant + granisetron + dexamethasone (AGD). Overall, NEPA was the best regimen, and aprepitant + ondansetron + dexamethasone (AOD) is also worthy of recommendation because of its low cost and good effect. For patients with severe constipation, hiccups, asthenia and/or delayed nausea, RGD is worthy of consideration.
机译:多种三联止吐方案已被用于预防癌症患者基于顺铂的化疗引起的延迟呕吐和恶心。我们进行了网络荟萃分析,以比较不同方案的疗效。对PubMed,Cochrane Library和MEDLINE数据库进行电子搜索以识别随机对照试验,并使用JAGS,Stata 14.0和R project分析数据。主要结果是完全缓解(CR)。次要结局为无呕吐(NV)和无恶心(NN)。在确定的398项研究中,有10项符合条件并纳入研究,提供了9种方案的数据。在CR分析中,净化剂+帕洛诺司琼+地塞米松(NEPA)的绝对等级为0.8579。在NV和NN分析中,NEPA的绝对排名分别为0.8631和0.7902。由于不良反应的发生率低,因此使用罗拉吡坦+格拉司琼+地塞米松(RGD)治疗的患者依从性最佳,并且在NEPA中也观察到良好的依从性。难以与阿瑞匹坦+ Granisetron +地塞米松(AGD)保持良好的依从性。总的来说,NEPA是最好的治疗方案,阿瑞匹坦+恩丹西酮+地塞米松(AOD)也因其成本低廉和效果好而值得推荐。对于严重便秘,打ic,乏力和/或恶心延迟的患者,RGD值得考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号