...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology >Efficacy of antiemetic regimens for prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients of breast cancer receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy
【24h】

Efficacy of antiemetic regimens for prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients of breast cancer receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy

机译:抗抑制方案预防和治疗化疗诱导的恶心和抑制乳腺癌患者的疗效,接受高均匀化疗的患者

获取原文

摘要

Background: Chemotherapy is fraught with serious and troublesome adverse effects, of which nausea and vomiting appears earliest and is the most disturbing. Therefore, this study was planned to investigate the antiemetic drug regimens used for chemotherapy-induced nausea vomiting (CINV) in patients with breast cancer receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Subjects and Methods: An observational follow-up study was conducted to assess the efficacy of antiemetic regimens in breast cancer patients receiving HEC. A total of 71 newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer were included in the study. Patients were assessed for nausea by the visual analog scale, and a history of emetic episodes and need for rescue medication were recorded at 0 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 120 h post-chemotherapy till three cycles. Results: The patients were prescribed a combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone (n = 23, n = 17, and n = 13 in first, second, and third cycle, respectively) or a combination of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone (n = 48, n = 54 and n = 56 in the first, second, and third cycle, respectively). The intensity of nausea was higher for the patients who were prescribed ondansetron and dexamethasone regimen as compared to patients prescribed aprepitant additionally. Complete response, i.e., no emesis and no rescue medication, was higher in triple-drug regimen (52% vs. 0.4%, 63% vs. 17.6%, and 69% vs. 23% in three cycles, respectively). Conclusion: The control of CINV was better with a combination of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone as compared to a regimen without aprepitant.
机译:背景:化学疗法充满严重且麻烦的不良反应,其中恶心和呕吐是最早的,最令人不安。因此,计划研究该研究以研究乳腺癌患者接受高均匀化疗(HEC)的乳腺癌患者中用于化疗诱导的恶心呕吐(CINV)的止吐药物方案。对象和方法:进行了观察后续研究,以评估接受HEC的乳腺癌患者抑制方案的疗效。研究中共有71例新诊断的乳腺癌患者。通过视觉模拟量表评估恶心的患者,并且在0小时,6小时,24小时,48小时和120小时后记录了催化发作的历史和救援药物的需要,直到三次循环。结果:患者排列了ondansetron和地塞米松(n = 23,n = 17,分别首先,第二和第三循环)的组合或分别的组合,ondansetron和地塞米松(n = 48第n = 54和n = 56分别在第一,第二和第三周期中)。与另外4例的患者相比,患有ondansetron和地塞米松方案的患者的恶心的强度更高。三重药物方案的完全反应,即无呕吐和没有救援药物,分别在三个循环中分别为6.2%,63%,63%,63%,6.%,69%。结论:与未经共用的方案相比,CinV的控制更好,随着4.术治疗剂的组合,ondansetron和地塞米松。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号