首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NPG Open Access >Assessing the construct validity of five nutrient profiling systems using diet modeling with linear programming
【2h】

Assessing the construct validity of five nutrient profiling systems using diet modeling with linear programming

机译:使用线性规划的饮食建模评估五个营养物分析系统的构建有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nutrient profiling classifies individual food products according to their nutrient content. According to the WHO (World Health Organization), validation is a key step in the development of a nutrient profiling system. The aim was to assess the construct validity of five European nutrient profiling systems (Choices, Keyhole, (AFSSA), European Commission (EC) system and FoodProfiler). Construct validity was assessed for each of the five-selected nutrient profiling systems by testing whether healthy foods (that is, identified as eligible by the system) make healthy diets, and unhealthy foods (that is, non-eligible) make unhealthy diets, using diet modeling. The AFSSA, EC and FoodProfiler systems were identified as valid, but differences in their levels of permissiveness suggested some misclassified food products. The two other systems failed the construct validity assessment. Among these three systems, the EC system is the less demanding in terms of nutritional information, it would, therefore, be the easiest to implement for regulating nutrition and health claims in Europe.
机译:营养成分分析根据单个食品的营养成分进行分类。根据世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)的说法,验证是开发营养状况分析系统的关键步骤。目的是评估五个欧洲营养物分析系统(选择,钥匙孔(AFSSA),欧洲委员会(EC)系统和FoodProfiler)的构建有效性。通过测试健康食品(即被系统认定为合格)和不健康食品(即不合格)是否构成不健康饮食,分别对五种选择的营养状况分析系统的构建体有效性进行了评估。饮食建模。 AFSSA,EC和FoodProfiler系统被确定为有效,但允许水平的差异表明某些食品分类错误。另外两个系统未通过构造有效性评估。在这三个系统中,欧共体系统对营养信息的要求较低,因此,在欧洲,这是最容易实施的调节营养和健康声明的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号