首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NPG Open Access >Is psychosis a multisystem disorder? A meta-review of central nervous system immune cardiometabolic and endocrine alterations in first-episode psychosis and perspective on potential models
【2h】

Is psychosis a multisystem disorder? A meta-review of central nervous system immune cardiometabolic and endocrine alterations in first-episode psychosis and perspective on potential models

机译:精神病是多系统疾病吗?对首发精神病中枢神经系统免疫心脏代谢和内分泌变化的荟萃综述以及对潜在模型的看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

People with psychotic disorders show abnormalities in several organ systems in addition to the central nervous system (CNS); and this contributes to excess mortality. However, it is unclear how strong the evidence is for alterations in non-CNS systems at the onset of psychosis, how the alterations in non-CNS systems compare to those in the CNS, or how they relate to symptoms. Here, we consider these questions, and suggest potential models to account for findings. We conducted a systematic meta-review to summarize effect sizes for both CNS (focusing on brain structural, neurophysiological, and neurochemical parameters) and non-CNS dysfunction (focusing on immune, cardiometabolic, and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) systems) in first-episode psychosis (FEP). Relevant meta-analyses were identified in a systematic search of Pubmed and the methodological quality of these was assessed using the AMSTAR checklist (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews). Case–control data were extracted from studies included in these meta-analyses. Random effects meta-analyses were re-run and effect size magnitudes for individual parameters were calculated, as were summary effect sizes for each CNS and non-CNS system. We also grouped studies to obtain overall effect sizes for non-CNS and CNS alterations. Robustness of data for non-CNS and CNS parameters was assessed using Rosenthal’s fail-safe N. We next statistically compared summary effect size for overall CNSand overall non-CNS alterations, as well as for each organ system separately. We also examined how non-CNS alterations correlate CNS alterations, and with psychopathological symptoms. Case-control data were extracted for 165 studies comprising a total sample size of 13,440. For people with first episode psychosis compared with healthy controls, we observed alterations in immune parameters (summary effect size: g = 1.19), cardiometabolic parameters (g = 0.23); HPA parameters (g = 0.68); brain structure (g = 0.40); neurophysiology (g = 0.80); and neurochemistry (g = 0.43). Grouping non-CNS organ systems together provided an effect size for overall non-CNS alterations in patients compared with controls (g = 0.58), which was not significantly different from the overall CNS alterations effect size (g = 0.50). However, the summary effect size for immune alterations was significantly greater than that for brain structural (P < 0.001) and neurochemical alterations (P < 0.001), while the summary effect size for cardiometabolic alterations was significantly lower than neurochemical (P = 0.04), neurophysiological (P < 0.001), and brain structural alterations (P = 0.001). The summary effect size for HPA alterations was not significantly different from brain structural (P = 0.14), neurophysiological (P = 0.54), or neurochemical alterations (P = 0.22). These outcomes remained similar in antipsychotic naive sensitivity analyses. We found some, but limited and inconsistent, evidence that non-CNS alterations were associated with CNS changes and symptoms in first episode psychosis. Our findings indicate that there are robust alterations in non-CNS systems in psychosis, and that these are broadly similar in magnitude to a range of CNS alterations. We consider models that could account for these findings and discuss implications for future research and treatment.
机译:患有精神病的人除中枢神经系统(CNS)外,还在多个器官系统中显示异常;这会导致过高的死亡率。但是,尚不清楚在精神病发作时非CNS系统发生改变的证据有多强,非CNS系统发生的改变与CNS中发生的改变相比如何,或者它们与症状之间的关系如何。在这里,我们考虑这些问题,并提出潜在的模型来说明发现。我们进行了系统的元回顾,总结了中枢神经系统(侧重于大脑结构,神经生理学和神经化学参数)和非中枢神经系统功能失调(侧重于免疫,心脏代谢和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)系统)的作用大小第一集精神病(FEP)。在Pubmed的系统搜索中确定了相关的荟萃分析,并使用AMSTAR清单(评估系统评价的一种测量工具)对这些方法学的质量进行了评估。病例对照数据摘自这些荟萃分析中的研究。重新运行随机效应荟萃分析,并计算各个参数的效应大小幅度,以及每个CNS和非CNS系统的汇总效应大小。我们还将研究分组,以获得非中枢神经系统和中枢神经系统改变的总体效果大小。使用Rosenthal的故障安全N评估了非CNS和CNS参数数据的稳健性。接下来,我们对总体CNS和总体非CNS变更以及每个器官系统的汇总效应量进行统计学比较。我们还研究了非中枢神经系统改变如何与中枢神经系统改变相关,并与心理病理症状相关。提取了165个研究的病例对照数据,包括13440个样本。对于初发精神病的人与健康对照组相比,我们观察到免疫参数(总效应量:g = 1.19),心脏代谢参数(g = 0.23)的改变; HPA参数(g = 80.68);脑结构(g = 0.40);神经生理学(g = 0.80);和神经化学(g = 0.43)。将非中枢神经系统器官系统分组在一起,与对照组相比,为患者提供了整体非中枢神经系统改变的效果大小(g = 0.58),与总体中枢神经系统改变影响尺寸(g = 0.50)没有显着差异。但是,免疫改变的总效应量显着大于脑结构改变(P <0.001)和神经化学改变(P <0.001),而心脏代谢改变的总效应量显着低于神经化学改变(P = 0.04),神经生理学(P <0.001)和脑结构改变(P = 0.001)。 HPA改变的总效应量与脑结构(P = 0.14),神经生理学(P = 0.54)或神经化学改变(P = 0.22)没有显着差异。在抗精神病药物天真敏感性分析中,这些结果仍然相似。我们发现一些但有限且不一致的证据表明,非CNS改变与首发性精神病中的CNS变化和症状有关。我们的发现表明,非CNS系统在精神病方面存在强大的改变,并且这些改变的幅度与一系列CNS改变大致相似。我们考虑可以解释这些发现的模型,并讨论对未来研究和治疗的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号