首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology >Examining Dermatologist Use and Opinions of Ultraviolet Radiation for Cosmetic and Medical Purposes
【2h】

Examining Dermatologist Use and Opinions of Ultraviolet Radiation for Cosmetic and Medical Purposes

机译:检查皮肤科医生在化妆品和医疗用途中的使用和紫外线辐射的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>BACKGROUND: The commercial tanning industry has opposed efforts to educate the public on the risks of tanning as well as attempts to restrict minors’ access to tanning services. Despite a paucity of supporting literature, statements from the tanning industry claiming that dermatologists routinely use in-office phototherapy for cosmetic treatments and refer patients to tanning salons have successfully derailed and defeated legislation in many states. >OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate dermatologist referrals for ultraviolet radiation for cosmetic and medical purposes via tanning beds or phototherapy, as well as their opinions on tanning, legislation, and ultraviolet radiation counseling practices. >DESIGN: The study was conducted using a 10-question anonymous survey. >SETTING: The participants were surveyed during meetings of three regional dermatologic societies. >PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-two dermatologists attending society meetings participated in the study. >MEASURES: The authors measured physician referrals, opinions, and recommendations regarding ultraviolet exposure. >RESULTS: Zero physicians (0/152) recommended tanning salons for cosmetic reasons. These 152 dermatologists referred 458 (417 adult, 41 pediatric) out of an estimated 809,369 patients (0.057%) to tanning salons for medical treatment. Of these physicians, 76 out of 152 and 15 out of 152 reported referring at least one adult or one pediatric patient, respectively, within the last year. All respondents supported ultraviolet tanning legislation and discouraged cosmetic tanning. >CONCLUSION: These findings directly contradict the assertion that dermatologists use ultraviolet radiation for cosmetic purposes or routinely refer patients to tanning salons. This study underscores the complex nature of ultraviolet radiation, as dermatologists infrequently utilize ultraviolet radiation for medical purposes and unanimously support restrictive legislation. In addition, these dermatologists counsel against cosmetic tanning and list tanning bed use among their highest concerns with regard to the health of pediatric patients.
机译:>背景:商业日光浴行业一直反对向公众宣传日光浴的风险以及试图限制未成年人获得日光浴服务的努力。尽管缺乏支持性文献,但制革业的声明声称,皮肤科医生在许多州例行使用办公室内光疗进行美容治疗,并将患者转介至晒黑沙龙,这已成功地使立法脱轨并失败。 >目标:本研究旨在评估皮肤科医生转介的用于晒黑床或光疗的美容和医学用途的紫外线辐射,以及他们对晒黑,立法和紫外线辐射咨询实践的意见。 >设计:该研究使用10个问题的匿名调查进行。 >设置:在三个区域皮肤病学会会议期间对参与者进行了调查。 >参与者:参加社会会议的152位皮肤科医生参加了这项研究。 >措施:作者对有关紫外线照射的医生推荐,意见和建议进行了测量。 >结果:出于美容原因,零医师(0/152)建议使用美黑沙龙。这152名皮肤科医生将大约809,369名患者中的458名(417名成人,41名儿科)转诊到晒黑沙龙接受治疗。在这些医生中,去年报告的152名医生中有76名和152名医生中有15名分别提到至少一名成人或一名儿科患者。所有受访者都支持紫外线晒黑法,不鼓励进行化妆品晒黑。 >结论:这些发现与皮肤科医生使用紫外线进行美容或常规将患者转至晒黑沙龙的说法背道而驰。这项研究强调了紫外线辐射的复杂性质,因为皮肤科医生不经常将紫外线辐射用于医疗目的,并一致支持限制性立法。此外,这些皮肤科医生建议不要进行美容美黑,并且将美黑床的使用列为他们对儿科患者健康的最高关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号