首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Womens Dermatology >Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing
【2h】

Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing

机译:文字回收:科学写作中的自-窃

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To further the progress of scientific research and expand the literature, authors and editors share a common goal of producing and reviewing innovative publications. However, as publication rates increase, so does the amount of detected plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. This concept, also referred to as text recycling, is defined as the repurposing of one’s own previously published work in new publications without referencing the original source. There are advocates both for and against versions of text recycling, but without a universal protocol for authors and editors of what constitutes self-plagiarism, there is no strict standard among journals as to what is unethical. The advent of online text duplication detection software has been increasingly used by journals to assure that all published work is novel, but challenges remain. Converging on standardized guidelines would be beneficial with regard to text recycling and improving author education and the promotion of active communication between journals and authors during the submission process if confusion arises.
机译:为了促进科学研究的进展并扩大文献范围,作者和编辑们有着共同的目标,即制作和审阅创新出版物。但是,随着出版率的提高,包括自self窃在内的窃的数量也在增加。这个概念(也称为文本回收)被定义为在新出版物中重新引用自己先前已发表的作品,而不参考原始出处。有支持和反对文本回收版本的倡导者,但是没有关于构成self窃的作者和编辑的通用协议,期刊之间就不道德行为没有严格的标准。在线文本重复检测软件的出现已被期刊越来越多地使用,以确保所有已出版的作品都是新颖的,但挑战仍然存在。如果出现混乱,就文本回收和改善作者教育以及在投稿过程中促进期刊与作者之间的积极交流而言,就标准化准则达成共识将是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号