首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Can the Testing Effect for General Knowledge Facts Be Influenced by Distraction due to Divided Attention or Experimentally Induced Anxious Mood?
【2h】

Can the Testing Effect for General Knowledge Facts Be Influenced by Distraction due to Divided Attention or Experimentally Induced Anxious Mood?

机译:注意力分散或实验引起的焦虑情绪会分散注意力,从而影响常识事实的测试效果吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Studies on testing effect have showed that a practice test on study materials leads to better performance in a final test than restudying the materials for the same amount of time. Two experiments were conducted to test how distraction, as triggered by divided attention or experimentally induced anxious mood in the practice phase, could modulate the benefit of testing (vs. restudying) on the learning of interesting and boring general knowledge facts. Two individual difference factors (trait test anxiety and working memory (WM) capacity) were measured. Under divided attention, participants restudied or recalled the missing information in visually presented general knowledge facts, while judging whether auditorily presented items were from a pre-specified category. To experimentally induce anxious mood, we instructed participants to view and interpret negative pictures with anxious music background before and during the practice phase. Immediate and two-day delayed tests were given. Regardless of item type (interesting or boring) or retention interval, the testing effect was not significantly affected by divided (vs. full) attention or anxious (vs. neutral) mood. These results remained unchanged after taking into account the influences of participants’ trait test anxiety and WM capacity. However, when analyses were restricted to the study materials that had been learnt in the divided attention condition while participants accurately responded to the concurrent distracting task, the testing effect was stronger in the divided attention condition than in the full attention condition. Contrary to previous studies (e.g., ), there was no WM capacity × trait test anxiety interaction in the overall testing effect. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
机译:对测试效果的研究表明,对研究材料的实践测试比对相同时间段的材料进行重新研究能带来更好的最终测试性能。进行了两个实验,以测试在练习阶段由注意力分散或实验引起的焦虑情绪引起的分心如何调节测试对学习有趣而无聊的常识事实的好处(相对于重新学习)。测量了两个个体差异因素(性格测试焦虑和工作记忆(WM)能力)。在注意力分散的情况下,参与者在判断听觉呈现的项目是否来自预先指定的类别时,重新研究或回顾了视觉呈现的常识事实中缺少的信息。为了实验性地诱发焦虑情绪,我们指示参与者在练习阶段之前和练习期间查看和解释带有焦虑音乐背景的负面图片。立即进行了为期两天的延迟测试。无论项目类型(有趣或无聊)或保留时间间隔如何,分散注意力(相对于全神贯注)或焦虑(相对于中性)情绪均不会显着影响测试效果。考虑参与者特质测试焦虑和WM能力的影响后,这些结果保持不变。但是,当分析仅限于在分散注意力条件下学习的学习材料,而参与者准确地对同时分心的任务做出反应时,在分散注意力条件下的测试效果要比在全注意力条件下的测试效果强。与先前的研究(例如)相反,总体测试效果中没有WM能力×性格测试焦虑交互作用。讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号