首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Can the Testing Effect for General Knowledge Facts Be Influenced by Distraction due to Divided Attention or Experimentally Induced Anxious Mood?
【24h】

Can the Testing Effect for General Knowledge Facts Be Influenced by Distraction due to Divided Attention or Experimentally Induced Anxious Mood?

机译:普遍知识事实的测试效果是否受到分散注意力的分散或实验诱导的焦虑情绪影响?

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies on testing effect have showed that a practice test on study materials leads to better performance in a final test than restudying the materials for the same amount of time. Two experiments were conducted to test how distraction, as triggered by divided attention or experimentally-induced anxious mood in the practice phase, could modulate the benefit of testing (vs. restudying) on the learning of interesting and boring general knowledge facts. Two individual difference factors (trait test anxiety and working memory capacity) were measured. Under divided attention, participants restudied or recalled the missing information in visually-presented general knowledge facts, while judging whether auditorily-presented items were from a pre-specified category. To experimentally induce anxious mood, we instructed participants to view and interpret negative pictures with anxious music background before and during the practice phase. Immediate and two-day delayed tests were given. Regardless of item type (interesting or boring) or retention interval, the testing effect was not significantly affected by divided (vs. full) attention or anxious (vs. neutral) mood. These results remained unchanged after taking into account the influences of participants’ trait test anxiety and working memory capacity. However, when analyses were restricted to the study materials that had been learnt in the divided attention condition while participants accurately responded to the concurrent distracting task, the testing effect was stronger in the divided attention condition than in the full attention condition. Contrary to previous studies (e.g., Tse & Pu, 2012), there was no working memory capacity × trait test anxiety interaction in the overall testing effect. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
机译:测试效果的研究表明,研究材料的实践试验导致最终测试的性能比重新制定材料相同的时间。进行了两次实验以测试分散注意力,如在实践阶段的缺陷或实验诱导的焦虑情绪中触发,可以调节测试(与Resuding)的效果对有趣和无聊的一般知识事实的学习。测量了两个单独的差异因素(特质考试焦虑和工作记忆容量)。在划分的注意下,参与者在视觉上呈现的一般知识事实中重新调整或回忆起缺失的信息,同时判断视听奖励项目是否来自预先指定的类别。为了通过实验诱导焦虑的心情,我们指示参与者在实践阶段之前和期间在焦急音乐背景中查看和解释负面照片。立即和为期两天的延迟测试。无论项目类型(有趣或无聊)还是保留间隔,测试效果都不会受到划分(与充分)注意力或焦虑(与中性)情绪的显着影响。考虑到参与者特质考试焦虑和工作记忆力容量的影响后,这些结果保持不变。然而,当分析限于在分开的注意条件中学到的研究资料时,当参与者准确地回应并发分散注意力任务时,测试效果在分开的注意条件下比全面关注条件更强。与之前的研究相反(例如,TSE&PU,2012),没有工作记忆力×特征在整体测试效果中的特征测试焦虑相互作用。讨论了这些发现的理论和实际意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号