首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >From one medicine to one health and systemic approaches to health and well-being
【2h】

From one medicine to one health and systemic approaches to health and well-being

机译:从一种药物到一种健康以及系统性的健康与福祉方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Faced with complex patterns of global change, the inextricable interconnection of humans, pet animals, livestock and wildlife and their social and ecological environment is evident and requires integrated approaches to human and animal health and their respective social and environmental contexts. The history of integrative thinking of human and animal health is briefly reviewed from early historical times, to the foundation of universities in Europe, up to the beginning of comparative medicine at the end of the 19th century. In the 20th century, Calvin Schwabe coined the concept of “one medicine”. It recognises that there is no difference of paradigm between human and veterinary medicine and both disciplines can contribute to the development of each other. Considering a broader approach to health and well-being of societies, the original concept of “one medicine” was extended to “one health” through practical implementations and careful validations in different settings. Given the global health thinking in recent decades, ecosystem approaches to health have emerged. Based on complex ecological thinking that goes beyond humans and animals, these approaches consider inextricable linkages between ecosystems and health, known as “ecosystem health”. Despite these integrative conceptual and methodological developments, large portions of human and animal health thinking and actions still remain in separate disciplinary silos. Evidence for added value of a coherent application of “one health” compared to separated sectorial thinking is, however, now growing. Integrative thinking is increasingly being considered in academic curricula, clinical practice, ministries of health and livestock/agriculture and international organizations. Challenges remain, focusing around key questions such as how does “one health” evolve and what are the elements of a modern theory of health? The close interdependence of humans and animals in their social and ecological context relates to the concept of “human-environmental systems”, also called “social-ecological systems”. The theory and practice of understanding and managing human activities in the context of social-ecological systems has been well-developed by members of The Resilience Alliance and was used extensively in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, including its work on human well-being outcomes. This in turn entails systems theory applied to human and animal health. Examples of successful systems approaches to public health show unexpected results. Analogous to “systems biology” which focuses mostly on the interplay of proteins and molecules at a sub-cellular level, a systemic approach to health in social-ecological systems (HSES) is an inter- and trans-disciplinary study of complex interactions in all health-related fields. HSES moves beyond “one health” and “eco-health”, expecting to identify emerging properties and determinants of health that may arise from a systemic view ranging across scales from molecules to the ecological and socio-cultural context, as well from the comparison with different disease endemicities and health systems structures.
机译:面对复杂的全球变化模式,人类,宠物,牲畜和野生动植物及其社会和生态环境之间的千丝万缕的联系是显而易见的,需要对人类和动物健康及其各自的社会和环境背景采取综合方法。从早期的历史到欧洲大学的建立,一直到19世纪末比较医学的兴起,都对人类和动物健康的综合思维史进行了简要回顾。在20世纪,卡尔文·施瓦贝(Calvin Schwabe)提出了“一种药物”的概念。它认识到,人类医学和兽医学之间没有范式的差异,并且这两个学科可以促进彼此的发展。考虑到更广泛的社会健康和福祉方法,通过在不同环境中进行实际实施和仔细验证,将“一种药物”的原始概念扩展为“一种健康”。考虑到近几十年来的全球健康思想,生态系统方法已经出现。基于超越人类和动物的复杂生态思想,这些方法考虑了生态系统与健康之间不可分割的联系,被称为“生态系统健康”。尽管在概念和方法上有了这些综合发展,但人类和动物健康的大部分思想和行动仍停留在单独的学科孤岛中。然而,与分开的部门思维相比,统一应用“一种健康”的附加值的证据正在增长。在学术课程,临床实践,卫生和畜牧/农业部以及国际组织中越来越多地考虑采用综合思维。挑战仍然存在,围绕诸如“一种健康”如何发展以及现代健康理论的要素等关键问题集中。人类和动物在社会和生态环境中的紧密相互依存关系到“人类环境系统”的概念,也称为“社会生态系统”。抵御力联盟的成员已经很好地发展了在社会生态系统范围内理解和管理人类活动的理论和实践,并在千年生态系统评估中得到了广泛的应用,包括有关人类福祉成果的工作。反过来,这就需要将系统理论应用于人类和动物健康。成功的公共卫生系统方法实例显示出出乎意料的结果。与“系统生物学”(主要关注蛋白质和分子在亚细胞水平上的相互作用)类似,社会生态系统(HSES)中健康的系统方法是对所有复杂相互作用的跨学科和跨学科研究健康相关领域。 HSES超越了“单一健康”和“生态健康”的范畴,期望从系统的观点(从分子到生态和社会文化背景)的范围内,识别可能出现的新兴特性和决定因素。不同的疾病流行度和卫生系统结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号