首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Medical Sciences >Two-Year Follow-Up Results of Fluoroscopic Cervical Epidural Injections in Chronic Axial or Discogenic Neck Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
【2h】

Two-Year Follow-Up Results of Fluoroscopic Cervical Epidural Injections in Chronic Axial or Discogenic Neck Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

机译:慢性颈或椎间盘源性颈痛的荧光颈椎硬膜外注射的两年随访结果:随机双盲对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Study Design: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial.>Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cervical interlaminar epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroids for the management of axial or discogenic pain in patients without disc herniation, radiculitis, or facet joint pain.>Summary of Background Data: Cervical discogenic pain without disc herniation is a common cause of suffering and disability in the adult population. Once conservative management has failed and facet joint pain has been excluded, cervical epidural injections may be considered as a management tool. Despite a paucity of evidence, cervical epidural injections are one of the most commonly performed nonsurgical interventions in the management of chronic axial or disc-related neck pain.>Methods: One hundred and twenty patients without disc herniation or radiculitis and negative for facet joint pain as determined by means of controlled diagnostic medial branch blocks were randomly assigned to one of the 2 treatment groups. Group I patients received cervical interlaminar epidural injections of local anesthetic (lidocaine 0.5%, 5 mL), whereas Group II patients received 0.5% lidocaine, 4 mL, mixed with 1 mL or 6 mg of nonparticulate betamethasone.The primary outcome measure was ≥ 50% improvement in pain and function. Outcome assessments included numeric rating scale (NRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), opioid intake, employment, and changes in weight.>Results: Significant pain relief and functional improvement (≥ 50%) was present at the end of 2 years in 73% of patients receiving local anesthetic only and 70% receiving local anesthetic with steroids. In the successful group of patients, however, defined as consistent relief with 2 initial injections of at least 3 weeks, significant improvement was illustrated in 78% in the local anesthetic group and 75% in the local anesthetic with steroid group at the end of 2 years. The results reported at the one-year follow-up were sustained at the 2-year follow-up.>Conclusions: Cervical interlaminar epidural injections with or without steroids may provide significant improvement in pain and functioning in patients with chronic discogenic or axial pain that is function-limiting and not related to facet joint pain.
机译:>研究设计:一项随机,双盲,主动对照试验。>目的:评估颈椎间盘硬膜外注射局部麻醉剂或不使用类固醇治疗的有效性>背景资料摘要:无椎间盘突出症的颈椎间盘源性疼痛是成年人口患病和致残的常见原因。一旦保守治疗失败并排除了小关节疼痛,可将颈硬膜外注射视为一种治疗工具。尽管缺乏证据,但在治疗慢性轴向或椎间盘相关性颈痛中,硬膜外硬膜外注射是最常用的非手术干预措施之一。>方法:120例无椎间盘突出或神经根炎的患者通过受控的诊断性内侧支阻滞确定的小关节疼痛阴性和小关节疼痛被随机分配到两个治疗组之一。第一组患者接受局部麻醉的颈椎间盘硬膜外注射(利多卡因0.5%,5 mL),而第二组患者接受0.5%利多卡因,4 mL混合1 mL或6 mg非颗粒倍他米松,主要结果≥50改善疼痛和功能。结果评估包括数字评分量表(NRS),颈项残疾指数(NDI),阿片类药物的摄入量,就业情况和体重变化。>结果:出现明显的疼痛缓解和功能改善(≥50%)到2年末,73%的仅接受局部麻醉的患者和70%的接受类固醇局部麻醉的患者。然而,在成功的患者组中,定义为通过至少3周的2次初次注射而获得的持续缓解,在2结束时,局部麻醉组的局部麻醉药组改善了78%,局部类固醇组的局部麻醉药显着改善了75%。年份。在一年的随访中报告的结果持续到两年的随访。>结论:颈椎间盘硬膜外注射类固醇或不使用类固醇可能会显着改善患者的疼痛和功能慢性椎间盘源性或轴向性疼痛,功能受限,与小关节疼痛无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号