首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS >Russell and Burchs 3Rs Then and Now: The Need for Clarity in Definition and Purpose
【2h】

Russell and Burchs 3Rs Then and Now: The Need for Clarity in Definition and Purpose

机译:罗素和伯奇的3R过去和现在:明确定义和目的的需求

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Russell and Burch's The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique was first published in 1959. A Special Edition containing the original text was reissued in 1992, after its ideas had gained widespread interest in the scientific community. In the Principles, Russell and Burch proposed a new applied science that would improve the treatment of laboratory animals while advancing the quality of science in studies that use animals. They introduced and defined the terms replacement, reduction, and refinement, which subsequently have become known as ‘alternatives’ or ‘alternative methods’ for minimizing the potential for animal pain and distress in biomedical research. Here we describe and explain the original definitions of the 3Rs in the Principles, examine how current definitions differ among themselves and from Russell and Burch's definitions, and suggest relevant considerations for evaluating all definitions of the 3Rs.
机译:罗素和伯奇(Russell and Burch)的《人性实验技术原理》于1959年首次出版。在其思想引起科学界广泛关注之后,包含原始文本的特别版于1992年重新发行。 Russell和Burch在《原理》中提出了一种新的应用科学,它将改善对实验动物的治疗,同时在使用动物的研究中提高科学质量。他们引入并定义了替换,减少和完善的术语,这些术语后来被称为“替代方法”或“替代方法”,用于最大程度地减少生物医学研究中动物疼痛和困扰的可能性。在这里,我们描述和解释了《原则》中3R的原始定义,研究了当前定义之间以及与Russell和Burch的定义之间的区别,并提出了评估3R所有定义的相关考虑因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号