首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JARO: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology >Individual Differences in Behavioral Estimates of Cochlear Nonlinearities
【2h】

Individual Differences in Behavioral Estimates of Cochlear Nonlinearities

机译:耳蜗非线性行为估计的个体差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Psychophysical methods provide a mechanism to infer the characteristics of basilar membrane responses in humans that cannot be directly measured. Because these behavioral measures are indirect, the interpretation of results depends on several underlying assumptions. Ongoing uncertainty about the suitability of these assumptions and the most appropriate measurement and compression estimation procedures, and unanswered questions regarding the effects of cochlear hearing loss and age on basilar membrane nonlinearities, motivated this experiment. Here, estimates of cochlear nonlinearities using temporal masking curves (TMCs) were obtained in a large sample of adults of various ages whose hearing ranged from normal to moderate cochlear hearing loss (). A wide range of compression slopes was observed, even for subjects with similar ages and thresholds, which warranted further investigation (). Potential sources of variance contributing to these individual differences were explored, including procedural-related factors (test–retest reliability, suitability of the linear-reference TMC, probe sensation levels, and parameters of TMC fitting algorithms) and subject-related factors (age and age-related changes in temporal processing, strength of cochlear nonlinearities estimated with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, estimates of changes in cochlear function from damage to outer hair cells versus inner hair cells). Subject age did not contribute significantly to TMC or compression slopes, and TMC slopes did not vary significantly with threshold. Test–retest reliability of TMCs suggested that TMC masker levels and the general shapes of TMCs did not change in a systematic way when re-measured many weeks later. Although the strength of compression decreased slightly with increasing hearing loss, the magnitude of individual differences in compression estimates makes it difficult to determine the effects of hearing loss and cochlear damage on basilar membrane nonlinearities in humans.
机译:心理物理方法提供了一种机制,可以推断无法直接测量的人类基底膜反应的特征。由于这些行为措施是间接的,因此对结果的解释取决于几个基本假设。关于这些假设以及最合适的测量和压缩估计程序的适用性的持续不确定性,以及关于耳蜗听力损失和年龄对基底膜非线性的影响的未解决问题,促使了该实验的进行。在这里,在大量年龄各异的成年人的听力范围从正常到中等的人工耳聋中,使用时间掩蔽曲线(TMC)估计了人工耳蜗的非线性。即使对于年龄和阈值相近的受试者,也观察到各种各样的压缩斜率,因此有必要进行进一步的研究()。探索了导致这些个体差异的方差的潜在来源,包括与程序相关的因素(重测信度,线性参考TMC的适用性,探针感觉水平和TMC拟合算法的参数)和与受试者相关的因素(年龄和与年龄相关的时间处理变化,通过畸变产物耳声发射估算的耳蜗非线性强度,从外毛细胞对内毛细胞的损害来估算的耳蜗功能变化)。受试者年龄对TMC或压缩斜率没有显着贡献,并且TMC斜率随阈值变化不大。 TMC的重测可靠性表明,在数周后重新测量时,TMC掩蔽液的水平和TMC的总体形状没有系统地改变。尽管随着听觉损失的增加,压迫强度会略有下降,但压迫估计中个体差异的大小使得难以确定听力损失和耳蜗损伤对人基底膜非线性的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号