首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Bacteriology >Corepression of the P1 Addiction Operon by Phd and Doc
【2h】

Corepression of the P1 Addiction Operon by Phd and Doc

机译:Pd和Doc对P1上瘾操纵子的共鸣

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The P1 plasmid addiction operon encodes Doc, a toxin that kills plasmid-free segregants, and Phd, an unstable antidote that neutralizes the toxin. Additionally, these products repress transcription of the operon. The antidote binds to two adjacent sites in the promoter. Here we present evidence concerning the regulatory role of the toxin, which we studied with the aid of a mutation, docH66Y. The DocH66Y protein retained the regulatory properties of the wild-type protein, but not its toxicity. In vivo, DocH66Y enhanced repression by Phd but failed to affect repression in the absence of Phd, suggesting that DocH66Y contacts Phd. In vitro, a MalE-DocH66Y fusion protein was found to bind Phd. Binding of toxin to antidote may be the physical basis for the neutralization of toxin. DocH66Y failed to bind DNA in vitro yet enhanced the affinity, cooperativity, and specificity with which Phd bound the operator. Although DocH66Y enhanced the binding of Phd to two adjacent Phd-binding sites, DocH66Y had relatively little effect on the binding of Phd to a single Phd-binding site, indicating that DocH66Y mediates cooperative interactions between adjacent Phd-binding sites. Several electrophoretically distinct protein-DNA complexes were observed with different amounts of DocH66Y relative to Phd. Maximal repression and specificity of DNA binding were observed with subsaturating amounts of DocH66Y relative to Phd. Analogous antidote-toxin pairs appear to have similar autoregulatory circuits. Autoregulation, by dampening fluctuations in the levels of toxin and antidote, may prevent the inappropriate activation of the toxin.
机译:P1质粒成瘾操纵子编码Doc(一种杀死无质粒分离子的毒素)和Phd(一种不稳定的解毒剂,可中和该毒素)。另外,这些产物抑制操纵子的转录。解毒剂与启动子中的两个相邻位点结合。在这里,我们提供了有关毒素调节作用的证据,我们借助docH66Y突变对其进行了研究。 DocH66Y蛋白保留了野生型蛋白的调节特性,但没有毒性。在体内,DocH66Y增强了Phd的抑制作用,但在没有Phd的情况下未能影响其抑制作用,这表明DocH66Y与Phd接触。在体外,发现MalE-DocH66Y融合蛋白与Phd结合。毒素与解毒剂的结合可能是中和毒素的物理基础。 DocH66Y未能在体外结合DNA,但增强了Phd结合操纵基因的亲和力,协同作用和特异性。尽管DocH66Y增强了Phd与两个相邻Phd结合位点的结合,但DocH66Y对Phd与单个Phd结合位点的结合影响相对较小,这表明DocH66Y介导了相邻Phd结合位点之间的协同相互作用。相对于Phd,观察到几种电泳上不同的蛋白质-DNA复合物,其DocH66Y的含量不同。相对于Phd,亚饱和量的DocH66Y可以观察到最大的DNA结合抑制和特异性。类似的解毒毒素对似乎具有类似的自动调节电路。通过抑制毒素和解毒剂水平的波动,自动调节可防止毒素的不适当活化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号