首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Biology >Exploring Conflicts in Whole Genome Phylogenetics: A Case Study Within Manakins (Aves: Pipridae)
【2h】

Exploring Conflicts in Whole Genome Phylogenetics: A Case Study Within Manakins (Aves: Pipridae)

机译:探索全基因组系统发育学中的冲突:Manakins 内部的案例研究 (Aves: Pipridae)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Some phylogenetic problems remain unresolved even when large amounts of sequence data are analyzed and methods that accommodate processes such as incomplete lineage sorting are employed. In addition to investigating biological sources of phylogenetic incongruence, it is also important to reduce noise in the phylogenomic dataset by using appropriate filtering approach that addresses gene tree estimation errors. We present the results of a case study in manakins, focusing on the very difficult clade comprising the genera Antilophia and Chiroxiphia. Previous studies suggest that Antilophia is nested within Chiroxiphia, though relationships among Antilophia+Chiroxiphia species have been highly unstable. We extracted more than 11,000 loci (ultra-conserved elements and introns) from whole genomes and conducted analyses using concatenation and multispecies coalescent methods. Topologies resulting from analyses using all loci differed depending on the data type and analytical method, with 2 clades (Antilophia+Chiroxiphia and Manacus+Pipra+Machaeopterus) in the manakin tree showing incongruent results. We hypothesized that gene trees that conflicted with a long coalescent branch (e.g., the branch uniting Antilophia+Chiroxiphia) might be enriched for cases of gene tree estimation error, so we conducted analyses that either constrained those gene trees to include monophyly of Antilophia+Chiroxiphia or excluded these loci. While constraining trees reduced some incongruence, excluding the trees led to completely congruent species trees, regardless of the data type or model of sequence evolution used. We found that a suite of gene metrics (most importantly the number of informative sites and likelihood of intralocus recombination) collectively explained the loci that resulted in non-monophyly of Antilophia+Chiroxiphia. We also found evidence for introgression that may have contributed to the discordant topologies we observe in Antilophia+Chiroxiphia and led to deviations from expectations given the multispecies coalescent model. Our study highlights the importance of identifying factors that can obscure phylogenetic signal when dealing with recalcitrant phylogenetic problems, such as gene tree estimation error, incomplete lineage sorting, and reticulation events. [Birds; c-gene; data type; gene estimation error; model fit; multispecies coalescent; phylogenomics; reticulation]
机译:即使分析了大量序列数据并采用了适应过程的方法(例如不完整谱系排序),一些系统发育问题仍未解决。除了研究系统发育不一致的生物学来源外,通过使用解决基因树估计错误的适当过滤方法来减少系统发育数据集中的噪声也很重要。我们介绍了 manakins 案例研究的结果,重点关注由 Antilophia 和 Chiroxiphia 属组成的非常困难的分支。先前的研究表明,Antilophia 嵌套在 Chiroxiphia 中,尽管 Antilophia + Chiroxiphia 物种之间的关系一直非常不稳定。我们从全基因组中提取了 11,000 多个基因座 (超保守元件和内含子),并使用串联和多物种聚结方法进行了分析。使用所有基因座的分析得出的拓扑结构因数据类型和分析方法而异,马纳金树中的 2 个分支(Antilophia+Chiroxiphia 和 Manacus+Pipra+Machaeopterus)显示出不一致的结果。我们假设与长聚结分支(例如,联合 Antilophia + Chiroxiphia 的分支)冲突的基因树可能会因基因树估计错误的情况而富集,因此我们进行了分析,要么限制这些基因树包括 Antilophia + Chiroxiphia 的单系,要么排除这些基因座。虽然约束树减少了一些不一致,但排除树会导致物种树完全一致,无论使用的数据类型或序列进化模型如何。我们发现,一套基因指标 (最重要的是信息位点的数量和基因座内重组的可能性) 共同解释了导致 Antilophia + Chiroxiphia 非单系的基因座。我们还发现了渗入的证据,这可能是导致我们在 Antilophia+Chiroxiphia 中观察到的不一致拓扑结构的原因,并导致在多物种聚结模型中偏离预期。我们的研究强调了在处理顽固的系统发育问题(例如基因树估计错误、不完整谱系排序和网状事件)时识别可能掩盖系统发育信号的因素的重要性。[鸟类;c基因;数据类型;基因估计误差;模型拟合;多物种合并;系统发育基因组学;网状]

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号