首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance >CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales
【2h】

CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

机译:CON:Ceftriaxone抗性肠杆菌引起的所有感染不需要Carbapenems

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.
机译:CarbapeNems被认为是治疗头孢曲松抗生素引起的严重感染的选择药物。然而,由于全世界耐鲤鱼抗性的抗性增加,寻找肉豆蔻的替代品是必须的。潜在的选择包括β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,Temocillin,Cephamycins和一些非β-内酰胺药物。最争议的是piperacillin / tazobactam; Merino试验的结果受到挑战,因为当通过参考方法研究时,较差的结果较差的患者的分离患者通常不容易受到哌啶/塔沙漠酰胺的影响,并且由于药物未在延长输注中施用药物。简要讨论了其他潜在选择。我们得出结论,所有感染患者都没有必要对由头孢曲松抗性肠杆菌引起的所有感染患者必需的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号