首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Emergency Department Referral for Hospice and Palliative Care Differs among Patients with Different End-of-Life Trajectories: A Retrospective Cohort Study
【2h】

Emergency Department Referral for Hospice and Palliative Care Differs among Patients with Different End-of-Life Trajectories: A Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:临终关怀和姑息治疗的急诊部门推荐不同患有不同寿命轨迹的患者:回顾性队列队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emergency units have been gradually recognized as important settings for palliative care initiation, but require precise palliative care assessments. Patients with different illness trajectories are found to differ in palliative care referrals outside emergency unit settings. Understanding how illness trajectories associate with patient traits in the emergency department may aid assessment of palliative care needs. This study aims to investigate the timing and acceptance of palliative referral in the emergency department among patients with different end-of-life trajectories. Participants were classified into three end-of-life trajectories (terminal, frailty, organ failure). Timing of referral was determined by the interval between the date of referral and the date of death, and acceptance of palliative care was recorded among participants eligible for palliative care. Terminal patients had the highest acceptance of palliative care (61.4%), followed by those with organ failure (53.4%) and patients with frailty (50.1%) (p = 0.003). Terminal patients were more susceptible to late and very late referrals (47.4% and 27.1%, respectively) than those with frailty (34.0%, 21.2%) and with organ failure (30.1%, 18.8%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.022). In summary, patients with different end-of-life trajectories display different palliative care referral and acceptance patterns. Acknowledgement of these characteristics may improve palliative care practice in the emergency department.
机译:紧急单位已被逐步被认为是姑息治疗启动的重要设置,但需要精确的姑息治疗评估。发现不同疾病轨迹的患者在紧急单位设置外的姑息治疗推荐中有所不同。了解术轨迹与急诊部门患者特征的痛苦如何,可以帮助评估姑息治疗需求。本研究旨在调查不同寿命术后术后急诊部门痛苦转诊的时序和接受。参与者被分为三个寿命轨迹(终端,体力,器官失败)。转介时间的时间由转介日期和死亡日期之间的间隔确定,并且在有资格获得姑息治疗的参与者中记录了姑息治疗的接受。终端患者接受姑息治疗(61.4%)的最高验收,其次是有器官衰竭(53.4%)和体外患者(50.1%)(p = 0.003)。终端患者比患有脆弱(34.0%,21.2%)和器官衰竭(30.1%,18.8%)(P <0.001,P = 0.022)(P <0.001,P = 0.022)(分别为47.4%和27.1%)更容易受到较晚的(分别为47.4%和27.1%)(分别为47.4%和27.1%)(P <0.001,P = 0.022 )。总之,患有不同寿命结束轨迹的患者显示不同的姑息护理转诊和验收模式。对这些特征的确认可能会改善急诊部的姑息治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号