首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Gynecologic Oncology >Early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: is systematic lymph node staging mandatory?
【2h】

Early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: is systematic lymph node staging mandatory?

机译:早期上皮性卵巢癌:是系统淋巴结分期的强制性吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The indication for lymph node dissection (LND) in ovarian cancer patients has been a major topic of debate in the last decades. The recent prospective LION trial [1], demonstrated no outcome benefit of systematic LND in advanced disease with macroscopically complete resection and clinically normal lymph node (LN), and by that ended the debate in these cases. For early disease, things appear to be more complicated and data is conflicting. Maggioni et al. [2] showed some 20 years ago in a prospective randomized trial with the primary endpoint of positive LN, that they could be identified more often by systematic LND compared to LN sampling. Unfortunately, this trial was not powered for efficacy. Several large retrospective studies have demonstrated inconsistent results regarding the therapeutic potential of systematic LND in these cases.
机译:卵巢癌患者淋巴结解剖(LND)的指示是过去几十年争论的主要话题。最近的前瞻性舞膜试验[1]证明了系统性LND在晚期疾病中没有宏观完全切除和临床正常淋巴结(LN)的结果效益,并在这些情况下结束了辩论。对于早期疾病,事情似乎更复杂,数据是矛盾的。 Maggioni等人。 [2]在大约20年前在一个前瞻性随机试验中展示了阳性LN的主要终点,与LN采样相比,它们可以通过系统的LND更常用。不幸的是,这种试验没有动力效能。几种大型回顾性研究表明,在这些情况下系统LND的治疗潜力不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号