首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >The Relation of Clinic and Ambulatory BP with the Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality among Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis
【2h】

The Relation of Clinic and Ambulatory BP with the Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality among Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

机译:临床和动态BP与心血管事件风险的关系以及腹膜透析患者患者的全因死亡率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Large observational studies showed a U-shaped association of clinic blood pressure (BP) with mortality among patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Whether ambulatory BP provides a more direct risk signal in this population remains unknown. In a prospective cohort of 108 PD patients, standardized clinic BP was recorded at baseline with the validated device HEM-705 (Omron, Healthcare, Bannockburn, IL, USA) and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring was performed using the Mobil-O-Graph monitor (IEM, Stolberg, Germany). Over a median follow-up of 16 months (interquartile range: 19 months), 47.2% of the overall population reached the composite outcome of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or all-cause death. In Cox-regression analysis, systolic but not diastolic BP was prognostically informative. Compared with the reference quartile 1 of 24-h systolic BP (SBP), the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio for the composite outcome was 1.098 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.434–2.777) in quartile 2, 1.004 (95% CI: 0.382–2.235) in quartile 3 and 2.449 (95% CI: 1.156–5.190) in quartile 4. In contrast, no such association was observed between increasing quartiles of clinic SBP and composite outcome. The present study shows that among PD patients, increasing ambulatory SBP is independently associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events and mortality, providing superior prognostic information than standardized clinic SBP.
机译:大型观测研究表明诊所血压(BP)与腹膜透析(PD)患者的死亡率的U形关联。无论是动态血压提供了在这一人群更直接的危险信号仍然不明。在108名PD患者前瞻性队列,标准化诊所BP被记录了在基线与验证的设备HEM-705(欧姆龙,医疗保健,班诺克,IL,USA)用美孚-O-格拉夫执行和24小时动态血压监测监视器(IEM,施托尔贝格,德国)。在中位随访16个月(四分范围:19个月),占总人口的47.2%,达到非致死性心肌梗死,非致死性卒中或全因死亡的复合终点。在考克斯回归分析,收缩但不舒张压是预后信息。与四分位数的24小时的收缩压(SBP)1中的参考进行比较,用于复合结果的多变量调整危险比为1.098(95%置信区间(CI):0.434-2.777)的四分位数2,1.004(95%CI :0.382-2.235)的四分位3和2.449(95%CI:1.156-5.190)的四分位数4.相反,增加诊所SBP和复合结果的四分位数之间没有观察到这种相关性。本研究表明,PD患者中,增加门诊SBP独立与心血管不良事件和死亡率,提供比标准诊所SBP卓越的预后信息的风险较高有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号