首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >Screening for Social Risk Factors: A Comparison of Two Multi‐Domain Social Risk Screening Tools
【2h】

Screening for Social Risk Factors: A Comparison of Two Multi‐Domain Social Risk Screening Tools

机译:筛选社会危险因素:两种多领域社会风险筛查工具的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Amidst growing interest in identifying patients' social and economic risks in the context of health care delivery, many health care organizations have developed recommendations for multidomain social risk screening. A 10‐item instrument developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) includes six questions on material hardship (housing stability and quality, food security, transportation access, utilities security) and four on interpersonal violence. A set of measures recommended by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) includes one question on financial strain (difficulty paying for basic needs) and four on intimate partner violence (IPV), in addition to behavioral topics like smoking, alcohol use, and stress. We field‐tested both the CMMI and NAM questions to compare (1) rates of screening positive for socioeconomic risk factors (material hardship, financial strain, personal safety); and (2) patient acceptability.
机译:越来越兴趣在卫生保健交付的背景下识别患者的社会和经济风险,许多医疗组织都为多麦田社会风险筛查制定了建议。由Medicare和Medicaid创新中心(CMMI)开发的10件乐器包括六个关于物质困难(住房稳定和质量,粮食安全,运输机票,公用事业安全)和四个人际关系的问题。国家医学院推荐的一系列措施(NAM)包括一个关于金融压力的一个问题(难以支付基本需求)和四个关于亲密合作伙伴暴力(IPV),除了吸烟,酒精使用和压力等行为主题。我们经过现场测试CMMI和NAM问题,以比较(1)筛查社会经济风险因素的筛选率(物质困难,财务压力,个人安全); (2)患者可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号