首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics >Comparative efficacy and acceptability of five anti-tubercular drugs in treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of five anti-tubercular drugs in treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis

机译:五种抗结核药物在耐多药结核病中的比较疗效和可接受性:网络荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a serious form of tuberculosis (TB). There is no recognized effective treatment for MDR-TB, although there are a number of publications that have reported positive results for MDR-TB. We performed a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and acceptability of potential antitubercular drugs. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials to compare the efficacy and acceptability of five antitubercular drugs, bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin in the treatment of MDR-TB. We included eleven suitable trials from nine journal articles and six clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, with data for 1472 participants. Bedaquiline (odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.02-7.43), delamanid (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.36-4.89) and moxifloxacin (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.01, 7.31) were significantly more effective than placebo. For efficacy, the results indicated no statistical significance between each antitubercular drug. For acceptability, the results indicated no statistically significant difference between each compared intervention. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that any one of the five antitubercular drugs (bedaquiline, delamanid, levofloxacin, metronidazole and moxifloxacin) has superior efficacy compared to the others.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13336-015-0020-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)是结核病(TB)的一种严重形式。尽管有许多出版物报道了耐多药结核病的积极结果,但尚无公认的有效治疗耐多药结核病的方法。我们进行了网络荟萃分析,以评估潜在抗结核药物的疗效和可接受性。我们进行了一项随机对照临床试验的网络荟萃分析,以比较五种抗结核药物贝达喹啉,地拉曼尼,左氧氟沙星,甲硝唑和莫西沙星在治疗耐多药结核病中的疗效和可接受性。我们纳入了来自9篇期刊文章的11项合适的试验和来自ClinicalTrials.gov的6项临床试验,其中有1472名参与者的数据。贝达喹啉(比值比[OR] 2.69,95%CI 1.02-7.43),地拉曼尼(OR 2.45,95%CI 1.36-4.89)和莫西沙星(OR 2.47,95%CI 1.01,7.31)比安慰剂有效得多。对于功效,结果表明每种抗结核药物之间无统计学意义。对于可接受性,结果表明每种比较的干预措施之间无统计学显着差异。没有足够的证据表明这五种抗结核药物(贝达喹啉,地拉曼尼,左氧氟沙星,甲硝唑和莫西沙星)中的任何一种均比其他药物具有更强的疗效。 0020-x)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号