首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >423 What’s the beef with communication? Investigating communication styles of advanced animal science students
【2h】

423 What’s the beef with communication? Investigating communication styles of advanced animal science students

机译:423什么是沟通的牛肉?调查高级动物科学学生的沟通方式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Effective science communication skills are vital to the animal science industry for translating science-focused information to lay audiences. To address the American Society of Animal Science’s (2017) third core principle of communicating research and scientific information in an “open, transparent, and dynamic manner,” we sought to investigate the communication styles of students enrolled in a senior-level animal science (beef cattle production) course at Texas A&M University. To do so, we described students’ preferred communication style(s) and ranching experience levels to assess potential effect of ranching experience levels on communication styles. We used Hartman and McCambridge (2011) communication style assessment to describe the communication styles of amiable, analytical, driver, and expressive for students enrolled in this course during four semesters (N = 188; spring 2018 = 61, summer 2018 = 15, fall 2018 = 55, and spring 2019 = 57). Of these, 124 were females (66%) and all (100%) were animal science majors. Students preferred the amiable communication style (n = 59; 31.4%), while females preferred amiable (n = 124; 32.3%) and males preferred driver (n = 64; 29.3 %). Students were moderately experienced with ranching (M = 3.1, SD = 1.08 on a 1-to-5, lowest to highest, respectively, scale). We used a one-way, between-subjects ANOVA to compare the effect of ranching experience on communication styles at the P < 0.05 level and met the assumption of homogeneity using Levene’s test (P = 0.52). There was no significant effect [F(10, 174) = 0.68, P = 0.74]. Because amiable communicators are generally supportive but not assertive, we recommend implementing decision-making exercises to move them to become more assertive in making decisions. Previous experiences due to familiarity with livestock production were not related to communication styles. Therefore, we recommend investigating students’ communication styles to prepare animal science graduates to meet industry needs.
机译:有效的科学沟通技巧对动物科学行业至关重要,用于将专注的科学信息翻译成观众。为了应对美国动物科学学会(2017年)沟通研究和科学信息的第三核心原则,以“开放,透明,动态的方式”,我们寻求调查招收高级动物科学的学生的沟通方式(德克萨斯A&M大学的牛肉产量)课程。为此,我们描述了学生的首选通信风格和牧场体验水平,以评估牧场经验水平对通信风格的潜在影响。我们使用Hartman和McCambridge(2011)通信风格评估,描述了在四个学期(N = 188; 2018年Spring 2018,2018夏季春季= 15,秋天的学生在本课程中注册的学生的通信风格2018 = 55,2019年春季= 57)。其中,124名是女性(66%),所有(100%)都是动物科学专业。学生们更喜欢可爱的通信风格(n = 59; 31.4%),而雌性优选的伴侣(n = 124; 32.3%)和雄性优选的驱动器(n = 64; 29.3%)。使用牧场(M = 3.1,SD = 1.08在1到5上,分别为最高,分别为比例)中度经历了学生。我们使用单向的主题ANOVA来比较P <0.05级的牧场经验对通信风格的影响,并使用Levene测试符合均匀性的假设(P = 0.52)。没有显着影响[F(10,174)= 0.68,p = 0.74]。由于和蔼可亲的沟通者通常支持但不自信,我们建议实施决策练习,以使他们在做出决定方面变得更加自信。以前由于熟悉牲畜生产的经验与通信风格无关。因此,我们建议调查学生的沟通方式以准备动物科学毕业生以满足行业需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号