首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization Provision and Financing >Impacts of Health Care Industry Consolidation in PittsburghPennsylvania: A Qualitative Study
【2h】

Impacts of Health Care Industry Consolidation in PittsburghPennsylvania: A Qualitative Study

机译:医疗保健行业整合在匹兹堡的影响宾夕法尼亚州:一个定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While most studies of health care industry consolidation focus on impacts onprices or quality, these are not its only potential impacts. This exploratoryqualitative study describes industry and community stakeholder perceptions ofthe impacts of cumulative hospital, practice, and insurance mergers,acquisitions, and affiliations in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Since the 1980s,Pittsburgh’s health care landscape has been transformed and is now dominated bycompetition between 2 integrated payer-provider networks, health care systemUPMC (and its insurance arm UPMC Health Plan) and insurer Highmark (and itshealth care system Allegheny Health Network). Semi-structured interviews with 20boundary-spanning stakeholders revealed a mix of perceived impacts ofconsolidation: some positive, some neutral or ambiguous, and some negative.Stakeholders perceived consolidation’s positive impacts on long-term viabilityof health care facilities and their ability to adopt new care models, enhancedcompetition in health insurance, creation of foundations, and pioneering medicalresearch and innovation. Stakeholders also believed that consolidation changedgeographic access to care, physician referral behaviors, how educated patientswere about their health care, the health care advertising environment, andeconomies of surrounding neighborhoods. Interviewees noted that consolidationraised questions about what the responsibilities of non-profit organizations areto their communities. However, stakeholders also reported their perceptions ofnegative outcomes, including ways in which consolidation had potentially reducedpatient access to care, accountability and transparency, systems’ willingness tocollaborate, and physician autonomy. As trends toward consolidation are notslowing, there will be many opportunities to experiment with policy levers tomitigate its potentially negative consequences.
机译:虽然大多数对医疗保健行业的研究综合关注对的影响价格或质量,这些不是它唯一的潜在影响。这个探索者定性研究描述了行业和社区利益相关者的看法累积医院,实践和保险兼并的影响,宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡的收购和附属机构。自20世纪80年代以来,匹兹堡的医疗保健景观已被转化,现在占主导地位2个综合付款商 - 提供商网络之间的竞争,医疗保健系统UPMC(及其保险公司UPMC健康计划)和保险公司高标记(及其医疗保健系统Allegheny健康网络)。半结构化访谈20边界利益相关者揭示了一种感知的影响整合:一些积极的,一些中立或暧昧,一些负面。利益相关者感知整合对长期活力的积极影响卫生保健设施及其采用新护理模型的能力,增强健康保险的竞争,建立基础,和先锋医疗研究与创新。利益相关者还认为合并改变了地理访问护理,医师推荐行为,教育患者关于他们的医疗保健,医疗保健广告环境,以及周边社区的经济。受访者注意到整合提出了关于非营利组织的责任的问题他们的社区。但是,利益相关者还报告了他们对的看法负面结果,包括合并可能减少的方式患者获得护理,问责制和透明度,系统的意愿合作,医生自主权。随着整合的趋势不是减速,将有很多机会试验政策杠杆减轻其可能的负面后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号