首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicina >The History and Development of Hyperbaric Oxygenation (HBO) in Thermal Burn Injury
【2h】

The History and Development of Hyperbaric Oxygenation (HBO) in Thermal Burn Injury

机译:热烧伤损伤中高压氧化(HBO)的历史和发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Objectives: Hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) denotes breathing of 100% oxygen under elevated ambient pressure. Since the initiation of HBO for burns in 1965, abundant experimental and clinical work has been done. Despite many undisputedly positive and only a few controversial results on the efficacy of adjunctive HBO for burn injury, the method has not yet been established in clinical routine. Materials and Methods: We did a retrospective analysis of the literature according to PRISMA—guidelines, from the very beginning of HBO for burns up to present, trying to elucidate the question why HBO is still sidelined in the treatment of burn injury. Results: Forty-seven publications (32 animal experiments, four trials in human volunteers and 11 clinical studies) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Except four investigators who found little or no beneficial action, all were able to demonstrate positive effects of HBO, most of them describing less edema, improved healing, less infection or bacterial growth and most recently, reduction of post-burn pain. Secondary enlargement of burn was prevented, as microvascular perfusion could be preserved, and cells were kept viable. The application of HBO, however, concerning pressure, duration, frequency and number of treatment sessions, varied considerably. Authors of large clinical studies underscored the intricate measures required when administering HBO in severe burns. Conclusions: HBO unquestionably has a positive impact on the pathophysiological mechanisms, and hence on the healing and course of burns. The few negative results are most likely due to peculiarities in the administration of HBO and possibly also to interactions when delivering the treatment to severely ill patients. Well-designed studies are needed to definitively assess its clinical value as an adjunctive treatment focusing on relevant outcome criteria such as wound healing time, complications, length of hospital stay, mortality and scar quality, while also defining optimal HBO dosage and timing.
机译:背景和目标:高压氧合(HBO)表示在环境压力升高的100%氧气的呼吸。自1965年烧伤的HBO开始以来,已经完成了丰富的实验和临床工作。尽管许多无可争议的积极态度,但只有几个有争议的结果对血液损伤的辅助HBO的功效,但该方法尚未在临床常规中建立。材料和方法:我们根据PRISMA-指导对文献进行了回顾性分析,从HBO开始燃烧到现在,试图阐明为什么HBO仍然缺乏烧伤伤害的问题。结果:四十七种出版物(32例动物实验,人类志愿者的四次试验和11项临床研究)实现了纳入标准。除了四个发现很少或没有有益行动的调查员外,所有人都能够证明HBO的积极作用,其中大多数描述较少的水肿,改善愈合,感染或细菌生长,最近,减少后烧伤后疼痛。防止了烧伤的二次放大,因为可以保存微血管灌注,并且细胞保持可行。然而,HBO的应用涉及压力,持续时间,频率和治疗次数,大大变化。大型临床研究的作者强调了在严重灼伤中施用HBO时所需的复杂措施。结论:HBO无可争议地对病理生理机制产生了积极的影响,因此对烧伤的愈合和过程。少数阴性结果很可能是由于施用HBO的特性,并且在将治疗患者递送到严重病人时也可能也是相互作用的。需要精心设计的研究,以便将其临床价值视为关注伤口愈合时间,并发症,住院时间长度,死亡率和瘢痕质量等相关结果标准的辅助治疗,同时还定义了最佳的HBO剂量和时序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号