首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >The Influence of Dementia Caregiving Styles on Caregiver Distress and the Person With Dementia’s Quality of Life
【2h】

The Influence of Dementia Caregiving Styles on Caregiver Distress and the Person With Dementia’s Quality of Life

机译:痴呆症护理风格对痴呆症患者遇险和痴呆症的生活质量的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Building vertically upon the Stress Process Model, dementia caregivers’ cognitive-behavioral management styles are an understudied area with implications for dyadic care outcomes and tailoring of care interventions. We consider whether membership in five previously classified caregiving styles (Externalizers, Individualists, Learners, Adapters, Nurturers- which vary in their adaptability, dementia understanding, and behavioral management practices) impacts caregivers’ experiences of care-related stress and the quality of life of the person with dementia (PWD). Participants included 100 primary family caregivers for PWDs who were 74% female, 18% non-White, and on average 64 years old. Utilizing linear regressions, each caregiving style was considered as a key predictor (reference: Externalizers- poor understanding, non-adaptable approach, and punitive behavioral strategies) of the Caregiver Assessment of Function and Upset (CAFU) upset score, Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-C) distress scale, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), and PWD quality of life (QOL-AD) scale controlling for demographics, care duration, co-residency, and dementia severity. Relative to Externalizers, Nurturers (understanding, adaptability, positive engagements) had less CAFU upset (β=-0.4, p<.01), less NPI-C distress (β=-0.3, p<.05), and greater QOL-AD for the PWD (β=0.4, p<.01). Learners (recognize need to change care approach, attempting adaptability, trial-and-error behavioral care) also showed significantly lower NPI-C distress than Externalizers (β=-0.5, p<.01). Thus caregiving styles with more dementia understanding, adaptability and positive behavioral strategies showed less distress and better PWD QOL. Corresponding with recent dementia care summits calling for identification of caregivers at greatest risk for poor outcomes, targeting and tailoring interventions based on caregiving styles may lead to great public health impact.
机译:在应力过程模型上垂直建造,痴呆护理人员的认知行为管理风格是一个深受分子护理结果和护理干预措施裁缝的影响。我们考虑五个以前分类的护理风格(外部剂,个人主义者,学习者,适配器,养育者,培养者,培养者,滋养师范致力于的培训和行为管理实践)的成员资格会影响护理人员的关心压力和生活质量的经验痴呆症的人(PWD)。与会者包括100名主要家庭护理人员,适用于74%的女性,18%非白色,平均64岁。利用线性回归,每个护理风格被认为是护理人员评估功能和不安(CAFU)心烦意义(NPI-)的护理人员评估c)痛苦规模,Zarit负担访谈(ZBI)和PWD生活质量(QOL-AD)规模控制人口统计,护理持续时间,共居住和痴呆症严重程度。相对于外部剂,养育者(理解,适应性,阳性约定)较少的CAFU缺损(β= -0.4,P <.01),较少的NPI-C痛苦(β= -0.3,P <.05),更高的QOL- PWD的广告(β= 0.4,P <.01)。学习者(识别需要改变护理方法,试图适应性,试验和误差行为护理)也显示出比外部剂(β= -0.5,P <.01)显着降低NPI-C痛苦。因此,具有更多痴呆症的理解,适应性和积极行为策略表现出较少的痛苦和更好的PWD QoL。与最近的痴呆症护理股份相应呼吁识别护理人员,以对不良结果的风险,基于护理风格的瞄准和定制干预措施可能会导致公共卫生影响很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号