首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Dentistry Journal >Comparison of Postoperative Bleeding between Application of Polyglycolic Acid Sheet and Primary Closure in Tongue Cancer Patients with Partial Glossectomy
【2h】

Comparison of Postoperative Bleeding between Application of Polyglycolic Acid Sheet and Primary Closure in Tongue Cancer Patients with Partial Glossectomy

机译:舌癌患者术后术术术后术后出血术后出血的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The technique of covering a mucosal defect with fibrin glue and a polyglycolic acid sheet (MCFP) for the resection of mucosa is applied in oral cancers. The MCFP technique for partial glossectomy provides faster relief from postoperative pain and the prevention of scar contracture, unlike primary closure. However, it has a major complication of postoperative bleeding. This study sought to compare postoperative bleeding between the MCFP technique and primary closure. We designed a retrospective study with a cohort of 57 patients who underwent partial glossectomy with the MCFP technique or primary closure. Our primary predictor variable was the wound closure procedure (primary closure or the MCFP technique). The primary outcome variable was postoperative bleeding, and the other variables were patient characteristics, excision area and depth, tooth contact for the wound, and antithrombotic therapy. Statistical evaluation was performed with Pearson’s chi-squared test, Welch’s t-test, and multiple logistic regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The MCFP technique was selected for cases with a large excision area (1433 vs. 963 mm2, P = 0.029). Total postoperative bleeding occurred in 10 of 57 patients (MCFP technique: 7 of 37 cases; primary closure: 3 of 20 cases). There was no significant difference in bleeding between the two groups (P = 0.71). Postoperative bleeding was significant in patients with antithrombotic therapy (MCFP: 40% vs. primary closure: 2%, P = 0.0024). Postoperative bleeding timing was significantly different in the MCFP technique (6.4 days) from that of primary closure (1 day; P = 0.0076). Postoperative bleeding was not associated with the MCFP technique or primary closure. However, postoperative bleeding with the MCFP technique occurred later than that with primary closure. The MCFP technique is not recommended for patients on antithrombotic therapy.
机译:用纤维蛋白胶水覆盖粘膜缺陷的技术,用于切除粘膜的粘膜胶(MCFP)在口腔癌中施用。与初级闭合不同,部分光泽术的MCFP技术可从术后疼痛和防止瘢痕挛缩的救济。然而,它具有术后出血的主要并发症。本研究试图在MCFP技术与初级封闭之间进行比较术后出血。我们设计了一种回顾性研究,其中57名患者的群组与MCFP技术或初级封闭进行了部分光泽偏移。我们的主要预测器变量是伤口闭合程序(初级闭合或MCFP技术)。主要结果变量是术后出血,另一个变量是患者特征,切除面积和深度,牙齿接触,以及抗血栓接触。用Pearson的Chi-Squared测试,Welch的T-Test和多元逻辑回归进行统计评估。 P <0.05被认为是统计学意义。选择MCFP技术,用于具有大型切除区域的情况(1433对963mm2,p = 0.029)。总术后出血发生在57名患者中的10个(MCFP技术:37例中的7例中;初级闭合:3例20例)。两组之间出血中没有显着差异(P = 0.71)。术后出血在抗血栓形成患者中具有重要意义(MCFP:40%对初级闭合:2%,P = 0.0024)。 MCFP技术(6.4天)的术后出血定时与初级闭合(1天; P = 0.0076)显着差异。术后出血与MCFP技术或初级闭合无关。然而,随着MCFP技术的术后出血比主要闭合在一起。不建议在抗血栓形成治疗患者中使用MCFP技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号