首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Education >Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests

【2h】

Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests

机译：书签和昂贵标准设置方法在医疗性能测试中的有效性比较

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Mean and standard deviation for proses validity indicators of two methods

机译：两种方法的均值和标准偏差

著录项

期刊名称 BMC Medical Education
作者
Majid Yousefi Afrashteh;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2021(-1),-1
年度 2021
页码 -1
总页数 8
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类生理学;
关键词
Standard setting; Angoff; Bookmark;

机译：标准设置;舒适;书签;
入库时间 2022-08-21 11:55:43

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests [J] . Majid Yousefi Afrashteh BMC Medical Education . 2021,第1期

机译：书签和昂贵标准设置方法在医疗性能测试中的有效性比较
2. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method. [J] . Jalili M, Hejri SM, Norcini JJ Medical education . 2011,第12期

机译：两种标准设置方法的比较：三级Angoff方法的性能。
3. Setting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff method. [J] . Yudkowsky R, Downing SM, Popescu M Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges . 2008,第10Suppla期

机译：设定性能测试的标准：对三级Angoff方法的初步研究。
4. A validity study for Yes/No Angoff standard setting method using cluster analysis [C] . Fen-Lan Tseng, Jia-Min Chiou, Yao-Ting Sung International Conference on Natural Computation;International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery . 2015

机译：基于聚类分析的Yes / No Angoff标准设定方法的有效性研究
5. INVESTIGATION OF JUDGES' ERRORS IN ANGOFF AND CONTRASTING-GROUPS CUT-OFF SCORE METHODS (STANDARD SETTING, MASTERY TESTING, CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTING) [D] . ARRASMITH, DEAN GORDON 1986

机译：Angoff和对比组切分评分方法（标准设置，大师级测试，标准参考测试）中的法官错误调查
6. Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korean Radiological Technologist Licensing Examination: Angoff Ebel bookmark and Hofstee [O] . Janghee Park, Duck-Sun Ahn, Mi Kyoung Yim, 2018

机译：韩国放射技术专家执照考试标准制定方法的比较：AngoffEbelbookmark和Hofstee
7. Comparison of validity of Bookmark and Angoff Standard Setting Methods in Medical performance tests [O] . majid yousefi afrashteh 2020

机译：医疗性能测试中书签和昂贵标准设置方法的有效性比较
8. Setting Medicare Volume Performance Standards for Large Primary Care Medical Practices [R] . Tompkins, C. P., Wallack, S. S., Chilingerian, J. A., 1993

机译：为大型初级保健医疗实践制定医疗保险量表现标准

Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅