首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Clinical Investigation >Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose.
【2h】

Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose.

机译:人体葡萄糖耐量控制因素的生理评估:从对静脉内葡萄糖的反应中测量胰岛素敏感性和β细胞葡萄糖敏感性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The quantitative contributions of pancreatic responsiveness and insulin sensitivity to glucose tolerance were measured using the "minimal modeling technique" in 18 lean and obese subjects (88-206% ideal body wt). The individual contributions of insulin secretion and action were measured by interpreting the dynamics of plasma glucose and insulin during the intravenous glucose tolerance test in terms of two mathematical models. One, the insulin kinetics model, yields parameters of first-phase (phi 1) and second-phase (phi 2) responsivity of the beta-cells to glucose. The other glucose kinetics model yields the insulin sensitivity parameters, SI. Lean and obese subjects were subdivided into good (KG greater than 1.5) and lower (KG less than 1.5) glucose tolerance groups. The etiology of lower glucose tolerance was entirely different in lean and obese subjects. Lean, lower tolerance was related to pancreatic insufficiency (phi 2 77% lower than in good tolerance controls [P less than 0.03]), but insulin sensitivity was normal (P greater than 0.5). In contrast, obese lower tolerance was entirely due to insulin resistance (SI diminished 60% [P less than 0.01]); pancreatic responsiveness was not different from lean, good tolerance controls (phi 1: P greater than 0.06; phi 2: P greater than 0.40). Subjects (regardless of weight) could be segregated into good and lower tolerance by the product of second-phase beta-cell responsivity and insulin sensitivity (phi 2 . SI). Thus, these two factors were primarily responsible for overall determination of glucose tolerance. The effect of phi 1 was to modulate the KG value within those groups whose overall tolerance was determined by phi 2 . SI. This phi 1 modulating influence was more pronounced among insulin sensitive (phi 1 vs. KG, r = 0.79) than insulin resistant (obese, low tolerance; phi 1 vs. KG, r = 0.91) subjects. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the minimal model technique to determine the etiology of impaired glucose tolerance.
机译:使用“最小建模技术”在18个瘦弱和肥胖的受试者(88-206%理想体重)中测量了胰腺反应性和胰岛素敏感性对葡萄糖耐量的定量贡献。通过根据两种数学模型解释静脉葡萄糖耐量试验期间血浆葡萄糖和胰岛素的动力学来测量胰岛素分泌和作用的个体贡献。一个是胰岛素动力学模型,它产生了β细胞对葡萄糖的第一相(phi 1)和第二相(phi 2)反应性的参数。另一个葡萄糖动力学模型产生胰岛素敏感性参数SI。瘦弱和肥胖的受试者分为良好(KG大于1.5)和较低(KG小于1.5)葡萄糖耐量组。较低的葡萄糖耐量的病因在肥胖和肥胖的受试者中完全不同。瘦弱,较低的耐受性与胰腺功能不全相关(phi 2比良好耐受性对照低27.7%[P小于0.03]),但胰岛素敏感性正常(P大于0.5)。相反,肥胖的低耐受性完全是由于胰岛素抵抗(SI降低了60%[P小于0.01]);胰腺反应与瘦弱,耐受性良好的对照无差异(phi 1:P大于0.06; phi 2:P大于0.40)。受试者(不论体重如何)可以通过第二阶段β细胞反应性和胰岛素敏感性(phi 2。SI)的乘积分为良好的耐受性和较低的耐受性。因此,这两个因素主要决定了葡萄糖耐量的总体测定。 phi 1的作用是调节总体耐受性由phi 2确定的那些组中的KG值。 SI。与胰岛素抵抗(肥胖,低耐受性; phi 1 vs. KG,r = 0.91)受试者相比,在胰岛素敏感性(phi 1 vs. KG,r = 0.79)中,这种phi 1调节影响更为明显。这项研究证明了最小模型技术确定葡萄糖耐量受损病因的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号