首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis >Real‐time identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa direct from clinical samples using a rapid extraction method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
【2h】

Real‐time identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa direct from clinical samples using a rapid extraction method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

机译:使用快速提取方法和聚合酶链反应(PCR)直接从临床样品中实时鉴定铜绿假单胞菌

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

has emerged as one of the most problematic Gram‐negative nosocomial pathogens. Bacteremia caused by is clinically indistinguishable from other Gram‐negative infections although the mortality rate is higher. This microorganism is also inherently resistant to common antibiotics. Standard bacterial identification and susceptibility testing is normally a 48‐hour process and difficulty sometimes exists in rapidly and accurately identifying antimicrobial resistance. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a rapid and simple process for the amplification of target DNA sequences. However, many sample preparation methods are unsuitable for the clinical laboratory because they are not cost effective, take too long to perform, or do not provide a good template for PCR. Our goal was to provide same‐day results to facilitate rapid diagnosis. In this report, we have utilized our rapid DNA extraction method to generate bacterial DNA direct from clinical samples for PCR. The lower detection level for was estimated to be 10 CFU/ml. In addition, we wanted to compare the results of a new rapid‐cycle DNA thermocycler that uses continuous fluorescence monitoring with the results of standard thermocycling. We tested 40 clinical isolates of and 18 non‐ isolates received in a blinded fashion. Coded data revealed that there was 100% correlation in both the rapid‐cycle DNA thermocycling and standard thermocycling when compared to standard clinical laboratory results. In addition, total results turn‐around time was less than 1 hour. Specific identification of was determined using intragenic primer sets for bacterial 16S rRNA and outer‐membrane lipoprotein gene sequences. The total cost of our extraction method and PCR was $2.22 per sample. The accuracy and rapidness of this DNA‐extraction method, with its PCR‐based identification system, make it an ideal candidate for use in the clinical laboratory. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 15:131–137, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译:已成为最有问题的革兰氏阴性医院病原体之一。尽管死亡率较高,但由细菌引起的细菌血症在临床上与其他革兰氏阴性感染没有区别。该微生物还固有地对普通抗生素具有抗性。标准细菌鉴定和药敏试验通常需要48小时才能完成,有时难以快速,准确地鉴定出抗菌素耐药性。聚合酶链反应(PCR)是一种快速简单的扩增目标DNA序列的过程。但是,许多样品制备方法不适合临床实验室,因为它们不具有成本效益,执行时间太长或不能为PCR提供良好的模板。我们的目标是提供当日结果以促进快速诊断。在本报告中,我们利用我们的快速DNA提取方法直接从临床样品中生成细菌DNA用于PCR。的较低检测水平估计为10 CFU / ml。此外,我们想将使用连续荧光监测的新型快速循环DNA热循环仪的结果与标准热循环的结果进行比较。我们以盲法测试了40株临床分离株和18株非分离株。编码数据显示,与标准临床实验室结果相比,快速循环DNA热循环和标准热循环均具有100%的相关性。此外,总结果周转时间少于1小时。使用针对细菌的16S rRNA和外膜脂蛋白基因序列的基因内引物对确定的特异性鉴定。我们的提取方法和PCR的总成本为每个样品2.22美元。这种DNA提取方法的准确性和快速性及其基于PCR的识别系统使其成为临床实验室的理想选择。 J.临床实验室肛门15:131–137,2001。©2001 Wiley-Liss,Inc.。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号