首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational and Clinical Pharmacology >Data exclusivity through New Drug Reexamination in Korea: sibutramine hydrochloride (Reductil®) vs. sibutramine mesylate (Slimmer®) as an example
【2h】

Data exclusivity through New Drug Reexamination in Korea: sibutramine hydrochloride (Reductil®) vs. sibutramine mesylate (Slimmer®) as an example

机译:韩国新药复审中的数据独占性:以盐酸西布曲明(Reductil®)与甲磺酸西布曲明(Slimmer®)为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The ‘ ’ provision in the Regulation on the Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of New Drug in Korea has served as the data exclusivity term for any drug identical to a product subject to new drug reexamination. The legal debate that occurred between Abbott Korea and Hanmi in association with the approval of their sibutramine products, i.e., Reductil® vs. Slimmer®, showed why data exclusivity plays an important role to protect intellectual property of the innovator drug when incrementally modified drugs had to rely on the safety and efficacy data of the innovator drug for approval. The regulatory science and legal issues regarding the case of Reductil® vs Slimmer® were discussed, and the importance of was emphasized as a useful tool to protect intellectual property besides patent.
机译:韩国《关于新药安全性和有效性评估的法规》中的“”条款已成为与要进行新药复检的产品相同的任何药物的数据专有权。雅培韩国公司与Hanmi公司之间就其西布曲明产品的批准(即Reductil®vs.Slimmer®)的批准发生了法律辩论,这说明了当增量修饰的药物具有专利权时,为什么数据独占性在保护创新药物的知识产权方面起着重要作用依靠创新药物的安全性和有效性数据进行批准。讨论了有关Reductil®vsSlimmer®案的管理科学和法律问题,并强调了的重要性,它是保护专利以外的知识产权的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号