首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Lung Cancer Research >Broad-based genomic sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the dock
【2h】

Broad-based genomic sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the dock

机译:码头中晚期非小细胞肺癌的基础广泛的基因组测序

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The recently published study of Presley and colleagues ( ) aimed to ascertain if there is an association between broad-based genomic sequencing (defined as multigene Next-Generation Sequencing panels of 30 or more genes) and better survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For this purpose, the authors retrospectively analyzed data obtained from medical records of a large cohort of patients (n=5,688) with NSCLC from January 2011 to July 2016, treated in 191 community oncology practices across the United States. Overall, broad-based genomic sequencing was performed for 875 patients (15.4%) and routine genomic testing (testing of only) for 4,813 patients (84.6%). These two groups were compared for two parameters: the 12-month mortality using an instrumental variable approach and the overall survival with a propensity score-matched survival analysis. According to these analyses, the authors found no significant association between broad-based genomic sequencing and 12-month mortality [predicted probability of death: 41.1% for broad-based genomic sequencing 44.4% for routine testing; difference −3.6%, (95% CI, −18.4% to 11.1%)] or overall deaths [42.0% 45.1%; hazard ratio, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.73–1.11)], despite the unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showing better survival with broad genomic sequencing [hazard ratio 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62–0.77); log-rank P<0.001]. The authors concluded that the use of broad-based genomic sequencing for advanced NSCLC in the community setting is not independently associated with a survival advantage. The study conducted by Presley ( ) presented interesting data about the use of broad genomic approach as compared to routine genomic testing across different community oncology practices and among a large cohort of patients with NSCLC. However, some considerations are needed regarding the usefulness of multi-gene approach and the potential clinical benefit of targeted treatment.
机译:最近发表的Presley及其同事的研究()旨在确定基础广泛的基因组测序(定义为包含30个或更多基因的多基因下一代测序组)与晚期非小细胞患者更好的生存率之间是否存在关联肺癌(NSCLC)。为此,作者回顾性分析了从2011年1月至2016年7月在美国191个社区肿瘤学实践中接受治疗的一大批NSCLC患者(n = 5,688)的病历中获得的数据。总体而言,对875例患者(15.4%)进行了广泛的基因组测序,对4,813例患者(84.6%)进行了常规基因组测试(仅测试)。比较了这两个组的两个参数:使用工具变量法的12个月死亡率和使用倾向评分匹配的生存分析的总体生存率。根据这些分析,作者发现基础广泛的基因组测序与12个月死亡率之间无显着相关性[预测的死亡概率:基础广泛的基因组测序的41.1%为常规检测的44.4%;基础基因组测序的44.4%为常规检测的4%。差异-3.6%,(95%CI,-18.4%至11.1%)]或整体死亡[42.0%45.1%;尽管未经调整的Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,在广泛的基因组测序中存活率更高,但风险比仍为0.92(95%CI,0.73–1.11); [风险比0.69(95%CI,0.62-0.77);对数秩P <0.001]。作者得出的结论是,在社区环境中将基础广泛的基因组测序用于晚期NSCLC并不能独立地带来生存优势。 Presley()进行的研究提供了有趣的数据,这些数据与广泛的基因组方法的使用相比,与跨社区肿瘤学实践以及大量NSCLC患者的常规基因组测试相比。但是,关于多基因方法的有用性和靶向治疗的潜在临床利益,需要考虑一些因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号