首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Plants >Comparison of Read Mapping and Variant Calling Tools for the Analysis of Plant NGS Data
【2h】

Comparison of Read Mapping and Variant Calling Tools for the Analysis of Plant NGS Data

机译:用于植物NGS数据分析的读图和变异调用工具的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

High-throughput sequencing technologies have rapidly developed during the past years and have become an essential tool in plant sciences. However, the analysis of genomic data remains challenging and relies mostly on the performance of automatic pipelines. Frequently applied pipelines involve the alignment of sequence reads against a reference sequence and the identification of sequence variants. Since most benchmarking studies of bioinformatics tools for this purpose have been conducted on human datasets, there is a lack of benchmarking studies in plant sciences. In this study, we evaluated the performance of 50 different variant calling pipelines, including five read mappers and ten variant callers, on six real plant datasets of the model organism . Sets of variants were evaluated based on various parameters including sensitivity and specificity. We found that all investigated tools are suitable for analysis of NGS data in plant research. When looking at different performance metrics, BWA-MEM and Novoalign were the best mappers and GATK returned the best results in the variant calling step.
机译:在过去的几年中,高通量测序技术得到了快速发展,并已成为植物科学中必不可少的工具。然而,基因组数据的分析仍然具有挑战性,并且主要依赖于自动管线的性能。经常使用的流水线涉及相对于参考序列的序列读数比对和序列变体的鉴定。由于大多数为此目的的生物信息学工具的基准研究都是在人类数据集上进行的,因此缺乏植物科学中的基准研究。在这项研究中,我们评估了模式生物的六个真实植物数据集上的50个不同变体调用管道(包括五个读取映射器和十个变体调用器)的性能。基于各种参数(包括敏感性和特异性)评估变体集。我们发现所有研究的工具都适合在植物研究中分析NGS数据。当查看不同的性能指标时,BWA-MEM和Novoalign是最好的映射器,而GATK在变体调用步骤中返回了最好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号